|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, April 29, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
Battery makers seek duty differential
By Our Staff Reporter
KOLKATA, APRIL 28. There was a flood of battery imports
accounting for 30 per cent of industrial battery market during
April-December last year. According to figures available with the
Union Commerce Ministry, 1.9 million industrial batteries and
2.59 lakh (6 per cent of total demand) automotive batteries were
imported during the period. In the industrial segment, UPS and
telecom batteries (especially the four ampere UPS batteries)
where domestic producers had invested most in recent years, were
the worst hit. The extent of damage in fact was beyond all
estimates of secondary battery manufacturers.
Panic stricken, the Indian Battery Manufacturers' Association, a
forum of lead acid battery manufacturers, have renewed their long
standing demand for import duty differential between raw
material, namely, lead and finished products. At present both
were charged at 35 per cent. The IBMA wanted a 20 percentage
point difference between the two.
Lead is the single largest cost factor in lead-acid battery
manufacturing. The association alleges that only 25 per cent of
the total demand for lead is available in the domestic market,
that too produced by only one company - the public sector
Hindustan Zinc. With most of the lead sourced from international
market, Indian producers fall a prey to a anomalous duty
structure vis-a-vis a maximum of 10 per cent charged by major
exporting (to India) nations.
China, the biggest threat to Indian producers, sources lead from
the domestic market, Japan has practically no import duty, South
Korea charges 8 per cent import duty, Bangladesh (5 per cent),
and Sri Lanka (10 per cent). The situation is more or less same
in Thailand, Taiwan and Philippines.
Addressing newspersons, the vice president of IBMA and director
(automotive) of Exide Industries, Mr. S. Chand, said a large
number of batteries were actually routed through the SAARC
countries, taking advantage of an even lower import duty. Exports
from Bangladesh, for example, attracts a mere 17.5 per cent duty.
``Manufacturing batteries in India are fast becoming unviable and
the way things are moving Indian producers may shift their
production bases to neighbouring countries and import the
finished products in the near future''.
An anomalous duty structure is one thing but what concerns IBMA
is `dumping' of batteries at a price ``far below the material
cost''. It is based on their petition in December last, the
Government issued an interim order on April 9, imposing anti
dumping measures on all kinds of secondary battery imports from
China, South Korea and Japan.
The Ministry had also initiated investigations on dumping of dry
cell batteries by China. Dry cell is allegedly the first casualty
of Chinese dumping.
The IBMA expects that dumping had caused a major harm to the
unorganised lead acid battery manufacturers, accounting for
almost half of the total domestic production. ``Most of them are
about to pull down shutters'', Mr. Chand said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Indian Bank benefits from restructuring | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|