|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, June 29, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Chennai Corp. Council meeting: Commissioner did not turn up
By Our Staff Reporter
CHENNAI, JUNE 28. A total of 102 resolutions were passed in just
over five minutes at the Chennai Corporation Council meeting amid
noisy demands by the Opposition for inclusion of zero hour and a
discussion on the prevailing water scarcity.
The council also had another first - the Commissioner's seat was
vacant.
As soon as the meeting got underway, the Opposition councillors
led by the TMC leader, Mr. P. Vetrivel, and the AIADMK leader,
Mr. Karate R.Thiagarajan, rushed to the Mayor's podium, demanding
an explanation from Mr. M.K. Stalin, why a zero hour was not
included in the agenda. They also demanded a discussion on the
water scarcity.
The Mayor, however, refused to concede the demands, saying the
special meeting was called because the previous meeting on June
20 was adjourned abruptly following noisy scenes. He proceeded
with the agenda and Mr. Kalyanasundaram (DMK) raised a point of
order on the absence of the Commissioner.
The Mayor said he was not informed of the Commissioner, Mr. J. T.
Acharyulu's inability to attend. Later answering queries, the
Mayor said it was mandatory for the Commissioner to give a
written statement if he was not in a position to attend the
meeting and depute the next in line. This procedure was not
followed and he was not informed even this morning about the
Commissioner's intention.
``When events like this take place, it is very clear that there
is a concerted, political attempt to insult the office of the
Mayor. This will not be tolerated,'' he said.
The Commissioner, a 1970-batch IAS officer, who once served as
the Special Officer, the top post in the civic body, for a brief
period, was arrested on the eve of his son's wedding during the
previous DMK Government.
Meanwhile in the council, the ruling DMK decided not to adopt a
resolution informing the council of the appointment of the new
Vigilance Officer. In response to a resolution (number 100)
informing the council of the appointment, Mr. Stalin told the
council that under the present circumstances, the appointment
could not be accepted and passed a resolution seeking its
withdrawal. At this stage, the Opposition councillors demanded
that the issue be settled by a vote, but the Mayor passed the
resolution and adjourned the meeting.
It may be recalled that at the last council meet, the watch and
ward staff did not heed the Mayor's directive that the
demonstrating opposition councillors be taken out of the council.
The Commissioner later told presspersons that he had to attend a
review meeting held by the Chief Minister which was advanced to
11 a.m. from noon. Moreover, quoting Section 33 (1) and (2) of
the MCMC Act, 1919, he said the Commissioner had the right to
attend the council meetings ``if required to do so by the
Mayor..'' ``There was no message from the Mayor,'' he added.
To a query, he said he had informed the Mayor's personal
assistant through his personal assistant this morning of his
inability to attend the meeting in view of the review meeting.
``This was not a willful absence. Nor was it to disrespect the
Mayor,'' he added.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Tree felling in residential areas on the rise Next : Rotary Club plans 10,000 cataract surgeries | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|