|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, January 01, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
A disappointing experience
By G. Viswanath
MUMBAI, DEC. 31. It is unmistakable that the five national
selectors are not enjoying anymore selecting an Indian team. For
chairman, Mr. Chandu Borde, one among the first three Indian
batsmen to cross the 3000 mark in Test cricket and acknowledged
as a fine batsman in his times, it has been, sadly to say, a very
disappointing, nay a frustrating experience in the last three
months.
It was sheer accident that saw him once again become the chairman
of the selection committee at the Board of Control for Cricket in
India's Annual Generalbody Meeting in Jaipur in late September; a
majority of the West Zone members of the BCCI, unhappy with the
way Ajit Wadekar had gone about in functioning as chairman.
Mr. Borde was chairman of the committee, a decade ago. Then,
there was a feeling among people, in Pune in particular, that he
was not being good to Maharashtra's No. 1 batsman Milind Gunjal;
he did not consider him for the tour to England in 1986. It was
an eventful evening in Bombay when the selectors met to pick the
squad for England. Gunjal was deemed a certainty, but he was not
picked and Pune wept for the son of the soil. Mr. Borde, regarded
by many as one of the shrewdest in the game and with an eye for
spotting talent and passing quick judgment, was himself
disappointed, but probably did not feel a sense of remorse,
having been a party in not choosing Gunjal for the tour.
Thursday (December 30) was another day when Mr. Borde was at loss
for words while replying to questions, especially with regard to
Mohammad Azharuddin and Sameer Dighe. He could not articulate.
The unfortunate thing is that only the chairman is made to meet
the press. Mr. Borde's countenance was a literal give away that
he wanted Azharuddin in the team for the Carlton & United series
in Australia.
He did not appear to be miffed after enduring a marathon four
hour meeting, much of which was spent in presenting his
colleagues' point of view to Kapil Dev and Sachin Tendulkar and
patiently listening to them, mainly on what has been a vexing
issue for three months. Well, even after six meetings he was not
able to convince people in Australia that Azharuddin's experience
is necessary to provide stability to the middle order. Well. Mr.
Borde could have a created a crisis situation by picking
Azharuddin, but finally yielded to pressures.
Well, Mr. Borde is 65, a seasoned and mature man. Hence he was
able to give answers purely for public knowledge, not really
revealing what exactly happened for 240 minutes at the Mumbai
Cricket Association office. He said his committee's policy was
adhering to the ``young team'' principle, without realising that
Robin Singh was 36, Dighe 31, Javagal Srinath 30 and Venkatesh
Prasad 30.
Messrs. Madan Lal, Anil Deshpande, Thirumalai Sekhar and Ashok
Malhotra are much younger to Mr. Borde and were active players
when the latter was the Chairman. Except for Deshpande, who has
not played for India, the others have donned India's cap. They
represent different zones, but are generally seen as people who
will see only cricketing merit in selecting a player. It is
learnt that one of the selectors said at the meeting that, ``they
have been made selectors at the AGM of the BCCI and as such they
are accountable to Indian cricket.''
The selectors are upset, not only because the Indians lost the
Adelaide and Melbourne Tests by a big margin, but also because
the team management have not given opportunities to off- spinner
Harbhajan Singh and medium pacer Thirunavukarasu Kumaran. The
fact that they had to do the dirty job of dropping Kumaran for
the tri-series must have made them cross with Tendulkar and Kapil
Dev.
Indeed, they would not want anymore a four hour meeting to
finalise a team of 14, 15 or 16. On their part, they did not
pursue the matter relating to Ajay Jadeja, once they were told
about the BCCI President Mr. A. C. Muthiah's sound reasoning and
decision. Mr. Muthiah, has been at the helm for three months. He
has seen the pressures and pulls in Board meetings, but on
Thursday he felt it with regard to team selection.
Surely, he would not like to be a partaker in deciding the fate
of a player. But on Thursday he was steadfast in his assessment
of Jadeja's fitness. He strictly went by Dr. Mark Ferguson and
Dr. Tushar Mankad's reports and stated that Jadeja should
complete the rehabilitation programme and get fully fit.
And this saved the selectors from what could have proved to be a
troublesome issue. But after another round of a selection
committee meeting, this season's sixth, the selectors, have given
only the impression that picking an Indian team is a real chore,
not one that has given them joy. To Mr. Borde in particular.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : One-month ban for Akhtar Next : Bradman still casts a giant shadow | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|