|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, April 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Blair suffers fatherhood pangs
By Thomas Abraham
LONDON, APRIL 2. With the British Prime Minister, Mr. Tony Blair,
about to become a father in a little over a month, the big
question is whether he is going to be a model 21st century
parent, or whether he will remain stuck in the last century.
If he is to be a modern parent, women across the land expect him
to hand over the running of Britain to his deputy, and take
paternity leave to help look after the latest addition to the
Blair household. His wife, Ms Cherie Blair, a successful
barrister, and an advocate of parental leave for men and women,
would clearly like him to do so. At a public meeting last month,
she spoke approvingly of the example that the Finnish Prime
Minister, Mr. Paavo Lipponen, set by taking a week's leave after
his wife had a baby. ``I, for one, am promoting the widespread
adoption of this fine example,'' she declared, leaving no one in
doubt about the kind of debates that are going on in the Blair
household.
Mr. Blair is clearly under pressure. His wife and other women
expect him to set an example for other husbands and take leave to
help look after the new baby. But what sort of a signal would it
send if he absented himself from running the country for a few
weeks? Would the opposition Conservative party, led by the so far
childless Mr. William Hague, berate him for neglecting the
affairs of state? Would his own party use his absence to
undermine him? Or worst of all, would he return from leave to
find that the country was running better without him, and that no
one had even noticed he had gone?
With these different scenarios no doubt whizzing through his
agile political mind, Mr. Blair is clearly in a tizzy. During a
recent interview with a private television network, Mr. Blair
said, ``Cherie has made her position clear,'' adding ``but I have
to make sure the country is run properly.'' In another interview,
he said he had not made up his mind yet, and would be taking a
decision ``in the next few weeks.''
Campaigners for maternity and paternity rights are in no doubt
that Mr. Blair should take leave. Ms Jenny Mc Leish of the
Maternity Alliance said if Mr. Blair did take time off, ``it
would send the signal that he is prepared to put work second for
a short time.'' She also pointed out that the country was
unlikely to suffer, since the Blair family manages to go on
holiday every summer without the British Government coming to a
halt.
Britain only recently passed legislation allowing fathers to take
paternity leave. Fathers are allowed to take upto 13 weeks leave
until their child is 5 years old, though without pay. In this,
Britain lags behind the Scandinavian countries which have more
generous paternity leave benefits.
With a general election possible as early as next year, Mr.
Blair's finely-tuned political instincts will also be weighing
the impact on voters' minds of a decision to either take leave
and help look after the baby, or appearing to be the busy Prime
Minister and staying on in work. He has indicated that he will
follow the ``third way'' politics that he has pioneered and steer
a course somewhere in between these two choices. As he told the
BBC, ``Of course, I want to take some time with the baby when he
or she comes, but I honestly do not know what to do... .I will
have to find a third way.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Raul Castro leads 'Free Elian' rally Next : Anti-pollution agencies restore the pristine beauty of Japan | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|