|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, April 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Regional
| Previous
| Next
'Cover rural power subsidy in Budget'
By S. K. Ramoo
BANGALORE, APRIL 2. The Deepak Parekh Committee, constituted by
the State Government to study the issue of escrow cover to
independent power producers (IPPs), contrary to popular
expectations, has recommended that the sudsidised power to rural
regions may have to continue for some more time.
In its report it has pointed out that the Government's decision
on how to fund rural power subsidy will be one of the key
parameters which will determine the configuration of the planned
private distribution system. It is of the view that the rural
power subsidy be provided in the State Budget by making the
existing arrangement explicit. In other words, it has made it
clear that appropriate provisions should be made in the Budget so
that in the current transition phase in the power sector reforms,
Karnataka's industrial development will not suffer owing to power
shortage.
Under the on-going process of power sector reforms, the committee
has favoured decentralisation of both generation and distribution
of power, especially pertaining to the rural areas. It is of the
view that there is a need for reliable and timely power supply to
rural regions and that the rural people benefited from the
reforms process. The report states that the farmers, irrespective
of the tariff fixed, should be assured of quality power during
fixed hours every day. It feels that over-loading of rural power
lines, as is currently happening, should be avoided and the KPTCL
should not consider the rural power consumers with disdain as a
low- paying and unremunerative lot.
The report in one of its key recommendations has suggested that
the Munirabad, Shivasamudram, Shimshapura and Sharavathi
generating stations operated by KPTCL be sold to the KPCL. In a
far-reaching recommendation, it has suggested that the KPCL's
generation plants, following increase in their value, be sold to
IPPs and the resources generated be utilised for reduction of the
Government's fiscal burden. It, however, cautions against
utilisation of funds generated by privatisation for meeting the
increase of its revenue expenditure. The 30 per cent T and D
losses of gross energy equivalent to 6,799 million units, is
tantamount to lost energy of approximately 1,100 MW of thermal
power generation capacity. On account of it, the KPTCL is
expected to lose 8,000 million units during the current year. The
current energy consumption calculated by the KPTCL at 15,906
million units per annum translates into gross energy demand of
22,704 million units. According to the report, it is imperative
for the KPTCL to make a submission before the Regulatory
Commission to introduce cost-effective tariffs.
It has foreseen the KPTCL as a transmission utility and system
operator which will be carrying out periodical load forecast
studies. It will generate revenue by charging for utilisation of
its transmission lines.
Hailing the decision of the S. M. Krishna Government for
privatisation of power distribution system, it has pointed out
that the KPTCL should appoint a professional consultant for
assisting in carrying out a number of preparatory measures as
part of the implementation process. It has suggested that the
existing wheeling power policy in respect of captive generation
be extended automatically to other power producers.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Regional Previous : Increasing presence of foreign militants in J&K Next : Girl burnt alive | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|