|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, April 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Regional
| Previous
| Next
Christian Divorce Bill in next session
By Our Special Correspondent
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, APRIL 2. The Union Minister for Law, Mr. Ram
Jethmalani, has said that the Christian Divorce Bill will be
introduced in Parliament during its next session.
At a Meet-the-Press programme organised by the Press Club here
today, the Minister said he had waited to know the opinion of the
Christian community on the bill. A delegation representing
various Churches had met him and informed that they were happy
with the provisions.
Cross-voting in RS polls
The Minister said that open balloting should be introduced in the
elections to Rajya Sabha.Describing this as his personal view,
the Minister said that he did not see any reason why voting by
the elected representatives should be secret. Unlike in the case
of the general public, the legislators were not people who could
be intimidated. However, the Government had not formed any
opinion on the matter, he said.
Mr. Jethmalani said that considerable money power had been used
in the last few elections to the Rajya Sabha. This had destroyed
party discipline.
The Minister said the opening up of the legal profession to
international competition was inevitable. The GATT agreement,
signed by India, had references to services which included legal
services. He said the working paper prepared by the Law
Commission on how to go about with it would be put up for
national debate shortly. It was really painful that members of
the respectable profession of the lawyers had taken up the
cudgels against him, claiming that the Government had amended the
Advocates Act. All that had happened so far was the drawing up of
the working paper by the Commission, he said.
Mr. Jethmalani said the lawyers had objected to only three of the
50 amendments made to the Criminal Procedure Code. He had
expressed willingness to discuss them with their representatives.
However, they had not yet turned up for discussions. He was
committed to speeding up the justice system. If he failed to do
so in two years, he would quit as Minister of Law. About three
crore cases were pending before the subordinate courts and 32
lakhs before the High Courts, he said.
The Minister said shortage of judges were not the prime reason
for judicial delays. It was the procedure. There were, however,
financial problems in setting up new courts. Long procedures
delayed appointment of judges.
He said the proposed Freedom of Information Bill was an advanced
piece of legislation that was better than the American law on the
subject. Once the Bill becomes a law, all operations of the
government would become transparent. Every department in
Government would be required to set up information offices to
provide information to the public. Refusal of information sought
would be an exception. The provisions of the Official Secrets Act
would stand repealed to the extent it was inconsistent with the
new law.
The Minister reiterated that there was no sinister intention of
any kind behind the proposal to review the Constitution. Some
were misunderstanding the proposal by accident while some others
were determined to misunderstand it. The intellectuals
criticising the proposal should wait till the committee submits
its report.He said the committee was appointed because the socio-
economic objectives of the Constitution were not realised even
after 50 years. The choice of the retired Supreme Court Judge,
Mr. V.R. Krishna Iyer, to head the sub-committee on fundamental
rights itself was an assurance that the Government had nothing
else in mind.
Recalling that he was a student of Dr. Ambedkar, Mr. Jethmalani
said he regarded the Constitution as scripture of the Republic.
He held it higher than religious scriptures. However, as it was a
handiwork of human beings, there was bound to be mistakes. Those
who were speaking about the sanctity of the Constitution were
people who had amended the Constitution as many as 79 times.The
Minister said he was not satisfied with the standards maintained
by law colleges. However, heroic efforts were being made to
improve their functioning. The National Institute of Law at
Bangalore was achieving a status similar to that of Harvard.
He said funds and land stood in the way of setting up National
Schools of Law in Thiruvananthapuram and other places. There was
no political problem regarding that. But finding good teachers
was a problem.
He said he would be completing the formalities for setting up a
High Court bench in Thiruvananthapuram once the opinions of the
Kerala High Court and the Governor are received. One of those
opinions was yet to be received.
Asked about corruption in judiciary, Mr. Jethmalani said it was a
reflection of the condition of the society and its failings.
Whatever be the degree of screening done, some would escape
through the sieve. It would be late when their real character is
discovered.
He said that judicial activism had done some good. However, like
every good thing, it was subject to abuse.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Regional Previous : Girl burnt alive Next : Orissa tribals to get fair price for forest produce | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|