|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, April 04, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Beyond Pachmarhi
Sir, - Your Editorial ``Beyond Pachmarhi'' (March 29) is a good
analysis of the Congress party's current approach to political
alliances. It has practically abandoned the Pachmarhi thesis
rejecting coalition politics.
This change could be due to pragmatism, realpolitik and the
compulsion of keeping communal forces at bay. In Pondicherry, it
is for the TMC to explain why it did not discover the evils of
communalism for a year (from the day the DMK aligned with the
BJP). In Bihar the approach of the Congress has been one of sheer
opportunism.
The findings of the A. K. Antony Introspection Committee on the
Congress debacle in the Lok Sabha elections attributed the defeat
to the ill-advised decisions of offering support to the Rabri
Devi Government in Bihar and the tea-party understanding with Ms.
Jayalalitha. The developments in Bihar show that the Congress is
determined not to learn from past experience and seek power at
the cost of principles.
That the Congress high command had to allow all its MLAs in Bihar
to become ministers as an insurance against defection is evidence
of it being neither high nor capable of getting its command
obeyed.
R. V. Chandramouli,
Chennai
Sir, - You have rightly observed that the Pachmarhi resolution is
a dead letter in Bihar and Pondicherry and the Congress is now
quite willing to partake in the business of power- sharing.
But in these days of fractured verdicts, no party can be true to
ideologies. What happened in Bihar is an alteration of the pre-
poll alliance by the Congress in order to avoid President's rule
whereas in Pondicherry the TMC has felt that the result of the
pre-poll alliance is sufficient to form a Government for only
four years and to have a post-poll alliance for the remaining one
year. In both the States, the ruling parties do not represent the
people's verdict. The Constitution Review Commission should look
into this aspect also.
B. Balasubramanian,
Pondicherry
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Kashmir dispute Next : Role of former PMs | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|