|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, April 09, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
Ethics, morality amidst robust sales?
By C. R. L. Narasimhan
Even after selling more than 5.50 lakh cars during the last
financial year (April 1999-March 2000), the passenger car
industry does not seem to exhibit either the confidence or the
maturity that comes with such success. One hastens to qualify the
above observation: the boom conditions in the industry - very
likely to extend to the next few years - have not spread the
cheer uniformly. The industry is highly skewed and fragmented.
Maruti alone sold 4.06 lakhs of those cars and Hyundai 75,660.
Telco, with 55,000 of its Indicas, and Daewoo (more than 40,000)
have been the other two significant performers. As for the rest,
reaching even a five digit figure is some distance and time away.
On the positive side the spur in car sales is directly
attributable to the competition. However, industry experts like
the Chairman of Daewoo India Mr. S. G. Awasthi are quick to point
out that such competition is only at the beginning stage. The
Indian market has to evolve not only in volumes and variety but
also in terms of ethics. Competition has already worked wonders.
At a very basic level it has created among Indian consumers
awareness of a modern automobile. The car manufacturers have done
their utmost to widen the market. There has been a tremendous all
round transformation in dealerships, service stations, finance
schemes and in practically every other area of automobile
ownership and usage.
Today's car market does not even remotely resemble what it was
just ten years ago. Yet there are glaring shortcomings caused
partly by the structure of the industry and partly by the
manufacturers' slow or faulty response to the market dynamics.
Fragmentation of the market is a reality. In an economic sense it
militates against economies of scale so essential for any
manufacturer's success. It is one of the main consequences
directly attributable to the manufacturers' lack of understanding
of the Indian market place. So far there have been only two
valuable lessons learnt: that Indian customers are price
sensitive to a degree but given the right choice they have been
prepared to move up the value chain - from the previously largest
selling A category (Maruti 800) to the B segment (Zen, Santro,
Indica, Matiz, Fiat Uno, Wagon R). The Maruti 800 is still a
successful car sales wise, but the model itself has had an
inordinately long run. Reports say that Maruti is contemplating
an entirely new product in that range.
The action has definitely shifted to the next higher segment.
Most of last year's action has been here - by way of new models,
extension of dealerships, attractive product dissemination and so
on. Getting on top of the B category has been a priority for all
car makers.
Even for those who do not have ready made models to offer in that
segment. All out efforts to woo the customers have their seamy
side. For many manufacturers the end seems to justify the means.
It is in that context that a whole lot of questionable tactics
have come to the fore.
Some of the auto companies' recent communication strategy
including advertisements are aimed as much at debunking
competitors as spreading information. Some of these questionable
tactics go in the garb of comparative advertising. In other
instances, it has taken the form of ``planting'' news - say an
``undercutting'' but unsustainable price announcement just a few
days before the bookings on a competitor's car are about to open.
There are examples under each category. The list is long but
instances that are highly topical today - the Hyundai campaign
against Ford's IKON 1.3 which has gone to the MRTP Commission is
only one of the several - merit attention if only to speculate on
what it seeks to achieve. Ironically, Hyundai has been one of the
few genuine successes in India: its success has gone far beyond
even the robust sales it has generated on its two models.
A rating agency recently gave the company's commercial paper
programme the highest rating. Since all manufacturers will
ultimately be judged by their financial performance, Hyundai's
success so early on seems exemplary. Most certainly the rules of
the communication game will be rewritten. The impetus may come
from unexpected quarters. Expensive strategies, not just
advertising but in total communications will backfire if they
only seek to belittle competitors. Comparative advertising ought
to be welcomed in the interests of consumers. It opens up the
market further. But it has to be based on a certain value system.
Otherwise, the nascent auto industry as a whole will be adversely
affected, says Mr. Awasthi.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : BHEL Bangalore maintains growth Next : Canara Bank likely to post Rs. 700 cr. operating profit | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|