|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, May 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Opposition accuses Govt. of saffronising education
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, MAY 2. The Opposition in the Lok Sabha today accused
the Vajpayee Government of ``saffronising'' education and pushing
its ``Hindutva'' agenda even as the Human Resource Development
Minister, Dr. Murli Manohar Joshi, denied the charge, saying
there was no political motivation behind the proposed review of
school curriculum.
He also defended the restructuring of the Indian Council of
Historical Research (ICHR) and the decision to suspend
publication of the ``Towards Freedom'' volumes of Prof. Sumit
Sarkar and Prof. K.N. Panikkar. All appointments in the ICHR, he
claimed, were made on merit. As far as the two volumes were
concerned, they had been recalled for review because of factual
distortions arising from ideological bias.
Earlier, the Opposition charged the Government with interfering
in autonomous educational institutions and tinkering with school
curriculum in the name of updating it. There was a demand for
setting up a committee to examine the new curriculum proposed.
The debate on demands for grants under the HRD Ministry was
marked by sharp exchanges with the BJP accusing the Left of
putting its ideological commitment above national interests.
Initiating the debate, Mr. Ramesh Chennitala (Congress-I) alleged
that the BJP-led Government was trying to subvert the Nehru-
Gandhi legacy and institutions such as the ICHR were on the verge
of collapse because of constant political interference.
Appointments to key positions were being made for political
reasons, he said, referring to the nomination of some well-known
pro-BJP academics to the ICHR.
Mr. Chennitala suggested a national debate on the new school
curriculum, saying there was more to it than met the eye; a
charge which Dr. Joshi later denied, saying all that was being
sought to be done was to ``upgrade'' the curriculum and
``modernise'' it.
Another Congress(I) member, Mr. P.K. Bansal, charged that the
Government was trying to promote the ``RSS-BJP agenda'' and
``subvert'' the country's secular education system. He alleged
attempts to ``brainwash'' young minds and cautioned that this did
not ``augur'' well for the country. Others who spoke along
similar lines included Mr. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh (RJD) and Mr.
Rashid Alvi (BSP).
From the BJP, Mr. Prakash Mani attacked the Left, saying
Communists had always tried to ``denigrate'' nationalism and did
not join the Quit India Movement. In 1962, they had refused to
call China an aggressor because of their ideological ties with
that country. He defended the Government's decision on the
Sarkar-Panikkar volumes, terming them factually distorted.
Members also expressed concern over the state of education with
the CPI(M) member, Mr. Samik Lahiri, describing the education
budget as a ``farce''. Mr. Ramji Lal Suman (Samajwadi Party)
pointed out that many schools lacked even basic amenities and did
not have enough teachers.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : India, Uzbekistan sign key security pacts Next : Govt., postal unions hold fruitful discussions | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|