|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, May 13, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
LTTE ban extension likely tomorrow
By Vinay Kumar
NEW DELHI, MAY. 12. The Government is all set to renew the ban on
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) which expires on May 14.
Sources in the Government indicated that the formal notification
extending the ban for another two years would be issued by the
Union Home Ministry on May 14.
Though the extension of the ban under Section 5 of the Unlawful
and Activities (Prevention) Act is only a formality, it assumes
importance in the wake of developments in Sri Lanka. Sources
pointed out the Government had already agreed in principle to
extend the ban but the formal notification would be issued on the
date when the ban already in force expires.
The indication comes amid inputs received here that the LTTE was
concerned over exercises conducted by the Indian Navy and the
Coast Guard along the Eastern sea board. The LTTE was said to be
worried over the pressure the exercises would exert on it if the
Sri Lankan Navy also increased its presence along the Northern
Sri Lankan coast.
Reports with the intelligence agencies suggest that while the
LTTE was expecting that the Indian Government would lift the ban,
it nevertheless has welcomed the Indian proposal for mediation in
case both the sides agreed to it.
The External Affairs Minister, Mr. Jaswant Singh, called on the
Union Home Minister, Mr. L.K. Advani, here this evening. It is
learnt that the two discussed the Sri Lankan situation in the
meeting that lasted for about an hour.
While the PMK has demanded lifting of the ban and described the
LTTE activities in Sri Lanka as ``liberation struggle'', the BJP
rejected it saying there was no question of lifting the ban on
LTTE.
At the all-party meet here on Tuesday, the Prime Minister, Mr.
A.B. Vajpayee, categorically stated that India was not for a
separate Eelam, and that it favoured a solution to the crisis in
the island country ``within the framework of Sri Lanka's unity
and territorial integrity.'' Some of the National Democratic
Alliance constituents had spoken in different voices but the
Government had reiterated it was against military intervention
and also wanted protection for the island's minorities,
especially the Tamils.
In a meeting with the Union Home Minister, Mr. L. K. Advani, last
month, the Janata Party president, Dr. Subramanian Swamy, had
pointed out that recently Canada had followed the U.S. in banning
the LTTE as a terrorist organisation. While demanding extension
of the ban, Dr. Swamy had told the Home Minister of the growing
ISI-narcotic trade connection of the organisation.
Refugee influx
An official spokesman of the Home Ministry stated there has not
been any significant influx of refugees from Sri Lanka. In April,
198 refugees reached Tamil Nadu and by May 9 nearly 114 arrived.
While 463 refugees arrived in 1998, the figure went up to 769
last year.
Most of the Sri Lankan refugees arrived in Rameshwaram from where
they were taken to the transit camp in Mandapam after
verification. He said that relief was provided though India is
not a signatory to the United Nations Convention of 1951 and
Protocol of 1967 dealing with the status of refugees. At present,
there are about 70,000 Sri Lankan refugees accommodated in 129
camps in Tamil Nadu and one camp in Orissa. The Government, the
spokesman said, aimed at repatriation of all the refugees with
the assistance of United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Comments distorted, says Jairam Ramesh Next : Pawar rules out return to Congress(I) | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|