|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, May 31, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Fujimori a threat: U.S.
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, MAY 30. The Clinton administration has moved swiftly
to denounce the political developments in Peru even as the
strongman there, Mr. Alberto Fujimori, went on national
television defending the Sunday election and saying there has
been a campaign to ``satanise'' the electoral process and to
``misinform and disorient'' the people.
The United States has maintained that the election was not
``valid'' and that Mr. Fujimori is a ``threat'' to the inter-
American system and democracy.
``No President emerging from such a flawed process can claim
legitimacy. The manner in which the Fujimori regime handled this
problem is a serious threat to the inter-American system and its
commitment to democracy'', the State Department said.
The tough statement from Washington is intended to send a clear
signal to Mr. Fujimori that despite the high profile cooperation
between the U.S. and Peru on the narcotics and the drugs front,
there could be no trade-offs when coming to an issue like
democracy.
The Clinton administration has not detailed the irregularities it
has seen in Sunday's run-off election, but the general impression
has been that the entire event was a sham with Mr. Fujimori using
every available resource including the military intelligence to
muzzle the Opposition.
The main Opposition candidate, Mr. Alejandro Toledo, pulled out
of the race two weeks ago, citing widespread irregularities in
the process. But at the time of balloting, Mr. Toledo's name was
still listed and he received some 17 per cent of the vote.
About 30 per cent of the vote was declared invalid and Mr.
Fujimori was declared ``elected'' having secured 51.1 per cent of
the total votes cast. Seeing a farcical and a rigged process, Mr.
Toledo urged his followers to write ``no to fraud'' in the ballot
paper.
Mr. Fujimori is undoubtedly under pressure, not just from the
Western world led by the U.S. but from his own neighbourhood
which is worried about learning all the wrong lessons from the
Peruvian experience.
With his back to the wall, Mr. Fujimori is arguing that the
election was fair and that he would not disappoint the people
``in initiating a more authentic democracy'' in the next five
years at the helm of affairs.
``This is the result of an election which is just, fair and
transparent, and unfortunately, we couldn't have international
observers as we wanted. We invited them. But this is not a
dictatorship'', Mr. Fujimori told CNN. The international monitors
had called for a postponement of the final vote. The Organisation
of American States, which is holding a special meeting in Canada
this week, is expected to have something substantive against
Lima.
Analysts say that at least two things are critical for Mr.
Fujimori to feel the pressure. First, the extent to which the
U.S. is willing to go to tighten the screws. Cutting off some $
130 millions for narcotics cooperation may not be the answer as
Washington too would be paying the price. Where the U.S. will
come to matter is in the international financial institutions.
Blocking loans to Peru will have a damaging effect on the
economy.
Second, much depended on how the Opposition in Peru rallied and
sustained their pressure against Mr. Fujimori.
After a day of massive protests in and around Lima, the country
is said to be relatively calm. Crucial at this stage is the
military which seems to be solidly behind Mr. Fujimori.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Battle for Jaffna far from over Next : Home rule restored in Ulster | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|