|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, June 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Consumer forum pulls up CGM of Chennai Telephones
By Our Special Correspondent
CHENNAI, JUNE 2. A consumer forum in the city has pulled up the
Chief General Manager (CGM) of Chennai Telephones for not
``complying with its order to pay compensation and rental
refund'' to a woman consumer for non-functioning of her telephone
connection for a month.
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (South),
comprising Mr. K. Ramasamy, president, and Mrs. K. Neelavathi
Bai, Member, had on April 3, directed the CGM to pay a
compensation of Rs. 10,000 and to refund the rent and tariff
charges of Rs.3,306 with costs to Ms. Swarnalaxmi of Todhunter
Nagar, Saidapet, within a month. It held that the complainant was
eligible to claim rental rebate for the said period, as it was
not a case of suspension of service but a deficiency in service.
As the order had not been complied with, the subscriber filed an
execution petition. The Forum president on Thursday asked the
City police commissioner ``to arrest the official and produce him
before the Forum on or before July 3''.
In her original complaint, the consumer said that her telephone
connection went out of order on March 13, 1998. She had made
several complaints between March 13 and April 15, 1998. She
sought compensation and rebate for the non-functioning of the
connection. The Chennai Telephones CGM countered that the
complaint was false, but admitted that no calls were entered in
the particular meter between the two dates.
The Forum said that if the department's contention that the fault
was cleared was true, then there should be at least some calls
for the said period. As there was no call for a month, it only
showed that the authorities had not cleared it. Even after
notice, as per the CGM's version itself, the fault was attended
to on April 20, 1998 only. The official also did not deny that
the complainant's husband was a heart patient. The non-
functioning of the telephone was a mental strain for any
consumer, the Forum said. The complainant was entitled for the
compensation and refund of tariff and rental charges.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Coming to terms with saffronites Next : Modern drainage system in Ambattur: crucial meeting tomorrow | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|