|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, July 09, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Ladakh demurs
The reaction in Ladakh to the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly's
autonomy resolution was mixed. SHUJAAT BUKHARI takes a look.
THE REACTION in Ladakh to the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly's
autonomy resolution was mixed. Leh town observed a strike and
protested against the demand, Kargil was quiet as were pockets in
Leh district. The Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council
(LAHDC) passed a resolution seeking separation for the State.
Of Ladakh's two districts, Kargil's population is 13 per cent
Buddhist and 87 per cent Muslim, and in Leh Buddhists form 85 per
cent and Muslims 15. There are some who wish to portray that
Muslims favour autonomy for J & K and Buddhists want Union
Territory status for Ladakh. But this is not quite true.
The Ladakh Buddhist Association's demand for Union Territory
status for the region, to end the alleged discrimination of the
last five decades, culminated in the creation of the LAHDC in
1995, when J & K was under President's Rule. But in 1996 the
ruling National Conference bagged one of the two Assembly seats
from Leh - Nobra - indicating that there were also those who want
to continue with the rest of the State, which stand the NC had
been championing.
The LAHDC chairman, Mr. Thupstan Chhewang, when contacted,
categorically said ``we are not against autonomy but want a
separation from the State as a Union Territory.'' The State
Minister, Mr. Qamar Ali Akhoon, has another take on the
situation. He says the Congress(I) dominates the LAHDC only
because the NC did not participate when elections were last held.
He points out that the NC won all three LAHDC seats for which
byelections were held and claims that in the elections due in
August the party will capture the LAHDC. This will ``demolish the
propaganda unleashed against the NC at the behest of some people
at the Centre''. The State Government described the LAHDC
resolution as ``unconstitutional and illegal''. ``A panchayat
resolution cannot replace the Assembly resolution,'' said an NC
leader .
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Farooq injects fire into the autonomy debate Next : Salt, Sonia and the Sangh Parivar | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|