|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, July 09, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Blair... beware
With a general election expected next year, the British Prime
Minister, Mr. Tony Blair, and his aides will be desperately
seeking to stem the tide of bad news, says THOMAS ABRAHAM.
FEW POLITICIANS could have had a worse week. On Wednesday, the
British Prime Minister, Mr. Tony Blair, received a drubbing in
Parliament from the Conservative Leader of the Opposition, Mr.
William Hague. Mr. Hague hauled the Prime Minister over the coals
for a proposal Mr. Blair had made to cut down on public
drunkenness and disorderly behaviour by giving the police powers
to impose on-the-spot fines. Senior police officers had dismissed
the scheme as impractical, deeply embarassing the Prime Minister.
Mr. Hague rubbed salt in the wound by taunting Mr. Blair in
Parliament over his differences of opinion with the police.
As the Prime Minister went home that day to lick his wounds,
there was worse news to come. The police had found his 16-year-
old son, Euan, late at night at Leicester Square, a popular
centre of entertainment in London, sitting by the side of the
road in a drunken state after having celebrated the end of his
school leaving GCSE exams a little to spiritedly. While there was
likelihood of the Opposition making political capital of an
incident that could have happened to any parent of teenagers, the
media reported the incident widely, and few could escape the
irony of the Prime Minister's son being found drunk the day after
his father had proposed tough fines to discourage drunkenness in
public. As Mr. Blair put it later, ``Being a Prime Minister can
be a tough job, being a parent is sometimes tougher, and you
don't always succeed.''
Though being a Prime Minister is undoubtedly tough at the best of
times, over the past month, Mr. Blair has been finding it tougher
than usual. Nothing seems to be going well for him, and the media
has been carrying little political news other than the series of
embarrassments that have dogged Mr. Blair. One of his close
supporters, the millionaire novelist, Mr. Ken Follet, launched a
scathing public attack on Mr. Blair's style of governance, which
he said was characterised by gossiping and backstabbing. A few
weeks earlier, the Women's Institute, a normally mild group of
middle-aged women, had heckled him during a speech. To compound
his problems, reports of divisions within his Government
dominated news headlines, confirming the impression in the public
mind of a Prime Minister who was losing his grip.
To an extent, it is inevitable that any Government, even one as
popular as this Labour Ministry was when it was elected three
years ago, will suffer reverses. But Mr. Blair's fall from grace
appears to be starker because it also clearly marks the end of
his long honeymoon with the British media. The rash of adverse
headlines and news stories marked the failure of a strategy that
Mr. Blair had successfully followed since his days in the
Opposition - using the media to project himself and his
party/Government in a positive light.
Both as Leader of the Opposition and as Prime Minister, Mr. Blair
has been acutely aware how important it is to have a constant
stream of positive headlines and news stories to help consolidate
his party's and Government's position. Until a few months ago,
Mr. Blair appeared to be succeeding supremely. It was rare to see
stories unfavourable to the Government on the front pages of the
British press. Except for the staunchly Conservative Daily
Telegraph and the Daily Mail, Mr. Blair and his advisers had
succeeded in winning over most of the other major British
newspapers. A key aide who has implemented Mr. Blair's media
strategy, has been his press secretary, Mr. Alistair Campbell. A
former tabloid journalist, Mr. Campbell has combined a shrewd
understanding of how to mould the news agenda with a combative
personal style which has allowed him to ensure a flow of positive
stories about the Government. But Mr. Campbell, after facing
increasing criticism for his ``spin doctoring'' of the media, has
retreated to the background, and is clearly playing a less active
role in day-to-day press management. This has clearly had an
impact on the Government.
The lack of an active press management strategy has led to a
string of disastrous headlines, and the impression is growing of
a Government which is increasingly ineffectual and at odds with
itself. Earlier, the occasional bit of bad news would be drowned
out by some skillfully planted news about some new Government
initiative or the other. This no longer seems to happen, and the
result has been a series of disasters for Mr. Blair.
Normally, the lack of a media strategy is not a fatal flaw in a
Government. But Mr. Blair's ``new Labour'' project has based the
success of its political strategy on its media strategy more than
most other political parties. Britain is a naturally Conservative
country, and the Blairite strategy has been to use the media to
win over a public which is instinctively anti-Labour. The media
was also to be used to win enough time for the Government to push
through deep political and economic reforms, which over the long
term would make Labour the natural party of Government in
Britain.
The seeming breakdown of the Government's media strategy, if
unchecked, could be a serious setback for Mr. Blair's ambitions
for a second term in Government. With a general election expected
next year, the Prime Minister and his aides will be desperately
seeking to stem the tide of bad news.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : High tension politics Next : That top of the world feeling | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|