|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, August 12, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
CM's reply on power tariff hike deferred
By R.J.Rajendra Prasad
HYDERABAD, AUG. 11 The debate on the hike on power tariff in the
Andhra Pradesh Assembly on Thursday and Friday was a tame affair
and the reply of the Chief Minister, Mr. N. Chandrababu Naidu,
has been postponed. Since the Annual Budget is to be presented on
Monday, the reply to the debate would come only on Wednesday.
It was earlier expected that the debate would end today, with the
CM's reply, but the visit of the Congress(I) President, Ms. Sonia
Gandhi, to Hyderabad to address a convention of District
Presidents of National Students Union of India, affected Congress
members' attendance in the House.
Dr. M.V. Mysoora Reddy was the main speaker for the Congress. For
the treasury benches, Mr. Gorantla Butchiah Chowdhary,
spearheaded the attack against the Congress leaders. The two
leaders made personal allegations. Dr. Mysoora Reddy suddenly
raised his voice to demand a roll-back due to the ``unanimous''
demand of the public.
Nothing new emerged in the debate, except trading of charges. The
Congress members freely levelled allegations of corruption and
kickbacks against the Chief Minister while Mr. Chowdhary paid
back the compliment by levelling charges against Dr. Rajasekhara
Reddy, who at one stage, got up to ask whether the debate was on
his personality and personal character or on the power tariff.
On Wednesday, Dr. Rajasekhara Reddy was backed in highlighting
the problem of power tariff hike by the secretaries of the CPI
and the CPI (M), Mr. S. Sudhakara Reddy and Mr. B.V. Raghavulu.
The annual revenue requirement of the TRANSCO suddenly jumped by
about 30 per cent in one year, (to Rs. 9,233 crores this year as
per TRANSCO's estimate), and after allowing for efficiency gains
and variable cost adjustment, the APERC accepted the figure of
Rs. 8,517 crores. The TRANSCO said that its revenue at pre-June
tariff came to Rs. 5,436 crores, leaving a gap of Rs. 3,080
crores.
One expected the elected members to question these figures,
especially about the reasons for the escalation while the Andhra
Pradesh GENCO and the Andhra Pradesh TRANSCO were acknowledged to
have been efficiently run till now. The Government would then
have to do a lot of explaining to convince the House on the need
for the tariff increase.
The Government, however, does not take the demand for a
referendum on tariff increase seriously, because nowhere is there
any public approval for any hike, leave alone a stiff hike, but
Governments everywhere have to levy taxes and increase rates. The
call of the Opposition to refrain from paying bills till the
tariff is rolled back as a democratic right also is not
convincing.
But the tendency in these debates is for the issues to get
diffused, and allegations and counter allegations to hold the
sway.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : NDA Govt. fails on various fronts: Sonia Next : Sonia urged to back demand for separate Telangana | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|