|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, August 27, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Mob mentality
FOR the past two weeks I have been looking at episodes in a
television documentary called "The Nazis: A Warning From
History". The episodes have dealt with the Holocaust, and the
rapid development during the early 1940s of the Nazi policy of
exterminating the Jews. It was all horribly and dreadfully
familiar, but none the less compelling in its awfulness.
One of the most terrifying aspects of the two episodes was the
extent to which ordinary citizens not only failed to protest at
what was being done - that would have required real courage and
would have placed the protesters themselves at risk of death -
but, in many cases, went along with it as something inevitable.
There were shopkeepers, for example, who profited by supplying
food to the Jews awaiting extermination, exchanging it for
jewellery of much greater value. Their attitude was: "We are in
business to make a profit. That is what it is all about".
It is easy to see in this the perversion of a people by Hitler
and his lieutenants, but that is facile. The uncomfortable
question raised by this kind of programme is: "In similar
circumstances, how many of us would behave in the same way?"
That question was moved from the hypothetical to the real by an
incident which took place in Portsmouth, on the south coast of
England. It came in the wake of the murder of a young girl, Sarah
Payne. It reflected anxieties by parents living on a Portsmouth
estate about the presence there of convicted paedophiles who had
completed their prison sentences. And it was encouraged by a
disgraceful campaign by the News of the World to "name and shame"
paedophiles.
What happened was a series of riots over two weeks, in the course
of which houses of suspected paedophiles were attacked, and three
men with no paedophile past were driven out of their homes by the
mob through mistaken identity. One of the profoundly disturbing
features of the whole business was that parents brought their
young children along, some of them in their prams, holding up
placards with such slogans as: "Kill the pervs" and "Don't house
them, hang them".
The politicians were caught on the wrong foot. They did not
support the mob, but the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott,
endorsed the call by the Leader of the Opposition, William Hague,
for a change in the law to enable paedophiles to be jailed for
life.
Parental fears about paedophiles as neighbours are real and
understandable, and there is a strong case for devising an
effective policy under which such people can be housed without
constituting a danger - or seeming to constitute a danger.The
parents on the estate may well have felt that their fears were
not being taken seriously, and that only by drastic action could
they get the political powers that be to listen. If that is so,
it is a serious criticism of the politicians.
There can be no case in a civilised society, however, for the
kind of witch hunt that was staged by the Portsmouth mob, and
there must be deep concern about the example which members of
such a mob set to their children by encouraging them to take
part. There must also be concern about a knee jerk reaction by
politicians. Changing the law in response to public agitation may
make the politicians feel good, and may earn them immediate
plaudits. It is a bad basis for properly conceived and well
thought through legislation.
It would be quite wrong and totally far-fetched to draw close
parallels between the behaviour of the Portsmouth mob and the
situation in Nazi Germany. What the Portsmouth events showed,
however, is how easy it is for people to get carried away by a
cause, to the point where reason, and the restraints of civilised
behaviour, are submerged. They showed also how difficult
politicians seem to find it to show real leadership against a
populist wave of opinion. No senior politician in this case spoke
firmly and unequivocally against what the rioters did.
To have done so would have invited obloquy - and no doubt also
criticism that the situation had arisen because of the failure of
politicians to have in place suitable ways of dealing with
paedophiles. There would be justification for the criticism.
Real leaders, however, have to be prepared at times to face
obloquy, and to stand up for the rule of law, even when -
especially when - thousands of people are taking the law into
their own hands.
BILL KIRKMAN
The writer is a Fellow of Wolfson College, Cambridge.
E-mail him at wpk1000@cam.ac.uk
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Sightings Next : Of mouse and man | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|