|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, August 27, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
Jharkhand State may have to tackle many scam cases
By Our Staff Correspondent
PATNA, AUG. 26. The bifurcation of Bihar is likely to affect the
judicial system with the impact that it might saddle the new
Jharkhand State with a plethora of scam cases that caused
political upheaval even at the national level.
While the geographical and administrative segmentation are under
way, the process of demarcation of the judicial system is likely
to pose a few problems with members of the judiciary not sure
about the jurisdiction of cases now under the supervision of the
Patna High Court, which has a Bench at Ranchi too.
Doubts were expressed by the Division Bench of the Patna High
Court monitoring the fodder scam case investigation by the CBI
yesterday. The two Judges were not certain that the Bench would
be empowered to monitor the entire case after the creation of
Jharkhand State, particularly in the light of the fact that most
cases related to the plateau region.
The two wondered if a separate Bench would have to be constituted
at Ranchi to monitor cases coming under its jurisdiction. They
also underscored the inevitability of Judges opting for either of
the two Benches.
One opinion emerged was that the chiefs of the Ranchi and Patna
Benches of the High Court could together sort out the
jurisdiction of cases and the Patna High Court be allowed to
retain some cases relating to the tribal heartland.
Another lawyer felt that since the Bench was monitoring the case
at the directive of the Supreme Court, the Bench was well within
its right to continue with the exercise till the Apex Court
passes any fresh order.
The Bench comprising Mr. Justice S. N. Jha and Mr. Justice S. J.
Mukhopadhyaya fixed the next date of monitoring on November 10,
apparently leaving it to the higher judicial authorities to
decide by then, by which time the new State is also expected to
be notified.
It, however, expected the various agencies involved to complete
their probes by then pointing out that they had taken more than
four years with no end in sight.
The CBI has thus far filed chargesheets in 36 cases while the
process was yet to be completed in relation to 10 others. Most
fodder scam cases pertain to districts like Ranchi, Hazaribagh,
Dumka, Chaibasa and Dhanbad, all of which will come under the
proposed Jharkhand State.
The doubts the Bench reflected on with respect to monitoring the
fodder scam case will basically apply to all cases relating to
the 18 districts of South Bihar which are pending disposal not
only at the level of the Patna High Court, but lower courts,
specially the numerous designated courts, located in Patna.
Even in the fodder scam cases, chargesheets had already been
filed in the CBI designated court and trials have begun in a few.
A decision would have to be taken whether such cases would be
allowed to run their natural course or transfer them to the new
State in which case these would most probably be handled by new
judges.
The first thing that would require to be done is the number of
cases which are related to the Jharkhand region. Most of the
major scams were hatched in the districts of Santhal Parganas and
Chotanagpur region. The others include the Bitumen scam, land
deal scam, a good part of the medicine purchase scam and the
muster roll scam, to name a few.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : Mahanta hits out at Assam PCC chief Next : New twist to tandoor murder case | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|