|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 30, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Tempers rise over the debate on right and wrong
By Our Special Correspondent
HYDERABAD, AUG. 29. The wordy combat in Tuesday's Assembly
proceedings was not just rhetorical but also hysterical with most
of the arguments lost in the din in the first half hour.
The argument of the CLP leader that the Congress(I) resorted to
an indefinite fast fired by the ideals of Mahatma Gandhi provoked
a sneer from the ruling party members who questioned the methods
adopted by the Opposition in its agitation against the power
tariff hike.
Dr.Reddy defended the Congress' stand stating his party was at
least walking in the footsteps of Mahatma Gandhi though no one
could compare himself with the Father of the Nation. The Minister
for Youth Affairs termed him as the `Rayalaseema Gandhi' in a
sarcastic manner.
The reference of the Chief Minister, Mr.N.Chandrababu Naidu, to
the Opposition's links with extremists because of the presence of
Gaddar at the Opposition camp sometime back led to the latter
recalling the statement of NTR that "naxalites are real
patriots". He also asked whether the mere presence of Gaddar
could tantamount to their having links with extremists and if so,
how would the ruling party justify the visit of the former Home
Minister, Madhava Reddy, to the hospital when Gaddar was
recuperating after being shot.
"It was just on humanitarian grounds", the ruling party members
contested. The Chief Minister asserted that Monday's rally
consisted militants of CPI(ML) groups that were maintaining
underground dalams, hence the conviction of the Government about
the Opposition links with them.
"If that be so, could Gummadi Narasaiah, the CPI-ML (New
Democracy) MLA be called a democratically elected member of the
House", the Congress-I leader wanted to know. If he was not, then
must he be allowed in the House, he wondered.
The Finance Minister, Mr.Y.Ramakrushnudu, raised the issue of
members' conduct in the House and sought action against
Mr.K.Suryapratap Reddy of the Congress(I) for violating norms of
decency. He broke the House's property, hence the cost must be
collected from him and if necessary, he should be suspended, he
said.
When the agitation's methods became a bone of contention, the
Opposition sought to know whether NTR taking the body of the
slain legislator, Siva Reddy, to the Governor's residence was
proper. The then Congress(I) Government was democratic enough to
allow the protest, Dr.Y.S.Rajasekhara Reddy pointed out.
"Yes, but it did not provide security to the same member when he
pleaded for it in the House", Mr.K.Vidyadhar Rao of the TDP cut
in to be disputed once again by the Opposition. Well, what is
good for goose may not be so for gander, the adage goes!
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Naidu's remarks touch off furore Next : BJP joins the chorus | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|