|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 30, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Nalini Netto tenders apology
By Our Staff Reporter
KOCHI, AUG. 29. The Secretary, Taxes, Ms. Nalini Netto, has
tendered an unconditional apology for casting aspersions on the
Judicial Commission in her writ filed before a Division Bench of
the Kerala High Court.
The Bench while accepting the apology allowed her to withdraw her
plea for quashing the Commission's order rejecting her prayer for
holding an in-camera proceedings in the case relating to the
alleged sexual harassment meted out to her by the former
Transport Minister, Dr.A. Neelalohithadasan Nadar.
The Bench comprising the Chief Justice Mr.A.V. Savant and
Mr.Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan posted the writ for August 31.
The Judges said that when the petition came up before them
yesterday, the court found that certain averments in the writ
were "not only unsustainable" but "prima facie wholly
objectionable". The court then asked Ms Netto's counsel whether
the petitioner wanted to persist with the averments.
While tendering apology for making the averments today, she said
in an affidavit that she did not intended to bring disrespect to
the High Court or its judges. She had always held the High Court
and judge in high esteem.
Ms. Netto said she was giving up the prayer for quashing the
order of the Commission rejecting her plea for holding the
proceedings in-camera.
The petition sought quashing of the order appointing the
Commission and a direction to the Additional DGP, Crime, to
complete the investigation on her complaint in a time-bound
manner.
She submitted that the Commission had been appointed to placate
the political party to which Dr. Nadar belonged. It had also been
pointed out that in fact, the appointment order had stipulated
that inquiry should be completed within four months from February
28. Later, the Government had extended the term till December 28.
The order extending the term was mala fide and amounted to abuse
of power. The petitioner did not object to setting up a
Commission as she thought that the Commission would consider
sitting in the context of registering a criminal case.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Kozhikode: local tie-ups hold the key Next : Police, sales tax officials attacked | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|