|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 24, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
A dialogue at the Prague Castle
By C. Rammanohar Reddy
PRAGUE, SEPT. 23. The troubled 2000 annual meetings of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank were today
honoured by an audience in the world's largest ancient castle
when the Czech President, Mr. Vaclav Havel, hosted an exchange of
views between the two financial institutions and their critics at
the 800-year-old Prague Castle.
``Praga - Dialog Locus,'' loosely translated as ``Prague - A
Place of Dialogue'' was planned on the personal initiative of the
playwright, Mr. Havel, who was unhappy with all the attention
being given to the security preparations for the conference; yet
the main organisers of the street protests boycotted the dialogue
since their nominees for the meeting had earlier been denied
entry into the Czech Republic.
The discussion among an international panel of seven speakers
(including somewhat curiously the currency trader-cum-
philanthropist Mr. George Soros) was moderated by Ms. Mary
Robinson, the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, in the
presence of a few hundred members of Czech and international
civil society, officials of the IMF, World Bank and the Czech
Government, quite expectedly saw views ranging from calls to shut
down the Bretton Wood twins to commitments by the heads of the
two besieged institutions to continue working for the advancement
of the welfare of the world's poor.
The most vociferous criticism came from Ms. Katerina Liskova,
representing a Czech NGO, who said that the world would be a
better place if the IMF and the World Bank did not exist while
Mr. Walden Bello, from Bangkok's Focus on Global South, was less
fiery than in a speech he gave at an NGO forum yesterday
preferring to speak today instead of multilateral lending to
corrupt developing country governments.
The middle ground was occupied by Mr. Trevor Manuel, South
Africa's Finance Minister, who said that while the two
institutions had much to account for, their closure would be
disastrous for Africa since only two countries in that continent
had access to global private capital with rest dependent on
multilateral funding.
When it came to the turn of Ms. Ann Pettifor, head of Jubilee
2000 the coalition of NGOs campaigning for a write-off of debts
of the world's poorest countries, she theatrically pointed to an
empty chair and said that was for an absent Minister from the
Group of Seven industrial nations since it was the G-7 and not
the Bretton Wood twins which was standing in the way of debt
forgiveness.
The 90-minute debate will have done little to defuse the tension
in the city ahead of the anti-globalisation protests planned for
next Tuesday.
But the participants in the dialogue must have at least left with
the satisfaction of having been present in the grand Ball Game
House of the castle followed by lunch on the lawns of the Palace
gardens which some said rivalled the grandeur of the Versailles
outside Paris.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Global trade lopsided, says Sinha Next : Focus on euro at IMF-World Bank meet | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|