|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, October 05, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
A civil exchange ends on a sharp note
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
BOSTON, OCT. 4. Whether it was tax cuts, health care, social
security or the environment, the first Presidential debate here
was punctuated by philosophy and vigour with both the Vice-
President, Mr. Albert Gore Jr and the Texas Governor, Mr. George
Bush, holding their own for 90 minutes.
A skilled debater and one who has the head for numbers, Mr. Gore
seemed to waste no time in going after his opponent - and
repeating several times during the course of the debate - that he
is not for giving breaks to a small minority of the wealthy. And
the Texas Governor, true to where he comes from, labelled it all
between who decides and who gets the breaks - the government or
the people.
Call it carefully scripted or whatever, Mr. Bush accused his
opponent of coming up with ``phoney numbers'' or ``fuzzy
Washington Math'' when the Vice-President was ripping apart Mr.
Bush's tax cuts, who would benefit from the prescription drug
plan or where the social security was heading down the road. On
one occasion, Mr. Bush took a dig at his opponent in a direct
fashion.
``This is the man who has got great numbers. He talks about
numbers. I'm beginning to think not only did he invent the
Internet, but he invented the calculator. It's fuzzy math,'' he
said when Mr. Gore argued that the wealthiest one per cent get
their tax cuts in the first year but that 95 per cent of the
seniors would have to wait for five years before they saw a
single penny coming their way.
For the most part, the first debate revolved around domestic
issues with the Yugoslav President, Mr. Slobodan Milosevic,
thrown in as a foreign policy question. The response from the
candidates came not only by way of what the United States should
do with the Yugoslavian strongman - the only agreement the whole
night perhaps was that Mr. Milosevic had to go but that American
force should not be used - but on the role of Russia, the limits
of American power, and the role of the U.S. overseas. And the
Iraqi President, Mr. Saddam Hussein, too figured, not by way of
Washington's policy towards Baghdad, but on the issue of energy
security and policy.
Clearly focussed on his core supporters of environmentalists, Mr.
Gore opposed his opponent's plan to partially open up Alaska's
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling. ``The only way
to become less dependent on foreign sources of crude oil is to
explore at home...Today we import a million barrels from Saddam
Hussein,'' Mr. Bush retorted.
Dressed in identical dark suits, white shirts and red ties,
neither Mr. Gore nor Mr. Bush made any serious mistakes; but the
expectations were certainly more on the Vice-President given his
skills as a debater as also in the experience of the last seven
years. For that matter, Mr. Bush had to rise up in the charts,
the first challenge in proving to the American people that he is
up to the job as President. Analysts believe that Mr. Bush has
more than passed his first test.
Abiding by strict rules, Mr. Gore seized the first opportunity by
saying that the Bush economic plan would mean spending more money
on tax cuts for the wealthy one per cent than all of the spending
proposed for education, health care, prescription drugs and
national defence combined. Mr. Bush countered by saying that Mr.
Gore's plan would lead to a ``dramatically'' bigger government
with at least 200 new or expanded programmes and an additional
20,000 bureaucrats on the payrolls.
The two candidates also sparred on the issue of abortion. Using
the recent Federal Drug Administration's approval of the abortion
bill as a starting point, Mr. Gore went on the offensive saying
that he supported a woman's right to choose and that he would
appoint justices to the Supreme Court who would not tamper with
the 1973 Roe vs Wade case that legalised abortion. Mr. Bush for
his part, said that he was pro-life, but discounted the
suggestion that he would use this as a litmus test for
appointments to the high court.
The exchange, which was quite civil, got somewhat sharp towards
the end when the question turned to character. Mr. Bush
criticised Mr. Gore on the fund raising scandals and argued that
the latter has to take responsibility for what went on in the
White House.
Mr. Bush remarked that he believed that the sign ``The Buck Stops
Here'' had moved from the Oval Office to the Lincoln Bedroom and
that was not right. To which Mr. Gore's response was, ``You may
want to focus on scandals; I want to focus on results.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : West moves to defuse W.Asia crisis Next : N-plant dispute sees a change of PM | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|