|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, October 15, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Bush outshines Gore in second encounter
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, OCT. 14. If polls taken immediately after the first
debate in Boston showed the Vice-President, Mr. Albert Gore Jr.,
coming away with a clear ``win'', it is a different story at the
end of the second encounter in North Carolina. Three snap polls
taken by television networks have all shown the Texas Governor,
Mr. George W. Bush, coming out on top, with one putting him ahead
by at least 16 percentage points.
Snap polls are dicey business but nevertheless, a part of the
political game. The biggest advantage for Mr. Bush was that he
stood his ground on foreign affairs, an area in which he was seen
as extremely uncomfortable and vulnerable. Mr. Bush packaged his
remarks around philosophical differences with his opponent while
being careful not to get dragged into details.
The post-debate polls are important in the sense that it sets the
stage for the final debate in St. Louis, Missouri, where the
candidates will be questioned by common citizens. At the Wake
Forest University in North Carolina, it was a format that the
Bush camp strived for and had its way.
If there were more areas of agreement between the candidates -
especially on matters of foreign policy - much of it had to do
with a calculated strategy. To Mr. Gore, it had to do with not
sounding too pompous and condescending; and for Mr. Bush, the
impression of closing ranks with the Commander-in-Chief at a time
of an international crisis and at the same time getting out the
philosophical differences, as for instance, in the use of
American troops overseas.
The candidates stayed with the broader themes, domestic and
foreign, and for a good reason. Both of them, especially Mr.
Gore, were criticised sharply for their ``math debate'' in Boston
last week; and the minute emphasis on details led to some
fumbling which was then passed off as examples of consistent
exaggerations.
Mr. Gore conceded, ``I got some of the details wrong last week in
some of the examples I used...One of the reasons I regret it is
that getting a detail wrong interfered several times with the
point I was trying to make.'' But the North Carolina debate
showed that Mr. Bush too could meet the same fate.
In trying to defend his State for punishing people charged with
hate crimes, Mr. Bush said the three men convicted in the 1998
killing of James Byrd, an African American, had been sentenced to
death. ``We can't enhance the penalty any more than putting those
three thugs to death. That is what is going to happen in the
State of Texas'', Mr. Bush responded. However, the fact is that
only two of the men got the death penalty and the third received
a life sentence for the murder of Byrd who was tied to the bumper
of a pick-up truck and dragged for about 5 km. The Bush campaign
immediately issued a correction.
Soon after the second debate was over, it was back to political
business with Mr. Gore campaigning in North Carolina before
heading for Wisconsin. Mr. Bush hit the campaign trail in the
crucial States of Pennsylvania and Michigan.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Estrada's woes worsen Next : Russian auditor confirms graft in Govt. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|