|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, October 15, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
Sons of the father
A BIOGRAPHER of the country's first Prime Minister has
necessarily to speak of the daughter and grandson who were also
elected to the same office. Likewise, a cricket writer honouring
Lala Amarnath has necessarily to append a postscript on his
playing progeny. His task is more pleasurable, too. For the
Nehru-Gandhis who followed Jawaharlal Nehru destroyed a once high
reputation, whereas the later Amarnaths superbly upheld the
cricketing traditions of their ancestor.
The patriarch had always intended it to be so. Thus he made his
eldest son, Surinder, a left-hander, against his natural
inclinations, to give him an early advantage against bowlers in a
land where there are few southpaws anyway. (The Lala's example
was to be followed by Hanif Mohammed, who taught his youngest
brother, Sadiq, to bat the other way around, and by Hemant
Kanitkar, whose successful guinea pig was his son, Hrishikesh.)
Surinder made his name as captain of the all-conquering Indian
Schoolboys side of 1967, whose other members included kid brother
Mohinder and the greatest of all Indian stumpers, Syed Kirmani.
Against English Schoolboys, at Lord's, his side needed 10 to win
with two balls left - and Surinder struck two sixes to get them.
Surinder scored thousands of runs in the Ranji Trophy, several
hundred in front of me. I remember especially two fine half-
centuries in a match between Delhi and Karnataka, where he played
Prasanna and Chandrasekhar with calm assurance, keeping out of
the good ones and stroking those that erred in length for four.
His best shots were the cut and the pull. These he played to good
effect in his first Test match, against New Zealand at Auckland
in January 1976, scoring 124 in the first innings. He also batted
quite capably against England in 1976-77 and against Pakistan in
1977-78, but was then dropped, and never recalled.
Surinder was a brooding and introverted character who talked
little on the field, or off it. Always sticking out of a trouser
pocket was a red handkerchief Lala Amarnath had once owned. The
father never forgave the Indian selectors for picking the boy
late and dropping him early. In the Lala's defence, it must be
said that Surinder was also an outstanding cover point, this at a
time when most Indian Test cricketers were outrageously bad
fielders. Including, as it happened, Mohinder Amarnath.
Mohinder played alongside his brother for Indian Schoolboys, Guru
Nanak Dev University, Punjab, Delhi, North Zone and India. Making
his debut against Australia at Madras in the final Test of the
1969-70 series, he bowled well, sharp inswing at medium pace, but
was then dropped for six years. When he returned to the Indian
side, it was as a batsman who bowled a bit. In an international
career that ran for close on 20 years, he was to make more
comebacks than Amitabh Bachchan.
Mohinder will be remembered, above all, for his part in the last
two matches of the 1983 World Cup. In the semi-final, against
England, he bowled tidily and then hit an exquisitely paced half-
century, watchful against Botham and Willis while milking the
lesser bowlers. In the final, where India batted first, he
started well but was then bowled off stump by Michael Holding,
the ball accelerating down the hill. His wicket was celebrated by
the West Indians more joyously than the wicket of Gavaskar that
preceded it, for, the previous winter, Mohinder had scored 600
runs in a Test series in the Caribbean. However, his work in this
match was not done yet. When the West Indies batted, chasing a
mere 183, Madal Lal and Roger Binny chipped away at the middle
order, but it was Amarnath who destroyed the tail.
In Test cricket, Mohinder reserved his best for the West Indies -
and for Pakistan. Cricket chroniclers have spoken of his mastery
of pace, the controlled hooking off Marshall and Holding, Imran
and Sarfraz. But, befitting a son of the Lala, he was also a
superb player of slow bowling. Where his brother Surinder played
from the crease, seizing on anything short, Mohinder went down
the track to drive. In that little cameo in the World Cup final,
he hit two successive boundaries off Larry Gomes, inside out, and
over extra cover. He also played that rather more skilful slow
bowler, Abdul Qadir, with complete assurance.
There was a Mohinder innings I should have watched, for missing
which I am kicking myself yet. It was in 1990, when he had just
been dropped from the Indian side for the eighth (and, as it
turned out, the last) time. Delhi was playing the sponsor's side
in the final of the Wills Trophy, but my home was a long way from
the Kotla, and some political party or other had threatened a
bandh. I thought buses would not run, but they did.
The next day's paper had a photograph of Mohinder playing a sweep
shot. He had hit a matchwinning 90. From memories of other times
I had watched him bat, I painstakingly reconstructed the other
strokes - the dab past point, the glide past square leg, the
front foot drives past cover and past mid on. Against Indian
bowlers on Indian wickets and in a limited overs game, there
would, of course, have been no hook shots.
The Amarnath I myself saw most of was the youngest, Rajinder. He
played for Indian Schoolboys before joining St. Stephen's College
in Delhi in the same year as I - 1974. He bowled much like his
brother and father had - late inswing off an eight step run. One
of the first matches we played together was a "friendly", where
Rajinder - or Johnny as we called him - was asked to umpire while
we batted. He called a wide and then, in the next instant, called
"over". I was appalled that a son of the Lala did not know the
rules. But in the time I saw enough to see that he, nonetheless,
had cricket in the blood, had a sure instinct for the game's
nuances and an ice-cool temperament. In a crucial inter-college
match, played on a rain-affected pitch, wickets were falling like
nine pins to a lean Sikh slow bowler named Paramjit Singh (later
of Orissa and East Zone). Rajinder swatted him from two sixes
over mid-wicket and, once the short legs had dispersed, calmly
took his singles.
Johnny Amarnath played in later years for Delhi, Punjab and
Haryana. His finest moment came at Bangalore's Chinnaswamy
Stadium in 1982, where he emulated his eldest brother in hitting
two half centuries against B. S. Chandrasekhar (after this match,
which Karnataka lost to Haryana, Chandra announed his
retirement). From the time Johnny played his first representative
match - for Delhi Schools - his father would tell any scribe who
cared to listen that he was a more gifted cricketer than his
brothers. Not that he was shy of praising his other sons.
There was a lovely moment on Pakistan television in the 1982-83
series, where Mohinder came in at 10 for 2, and immediately
hooked Imran for six. The Lala now spoke into the microphone:
"They dropped the boy for three years saying he cannot play fast
bowling".
Four years previously, Lala was in the commentary box while India
was at the receiving end of another thrashing in Pakistan. For a
day and more, Zaheer Abbas and Javed Mianded had batted together,
and the home broadcasters had run out of superlatives. At the tea
interval, with Zaheer 220 not out and Miandad a mere undefeated
160, a Pakistani in the box magnanimously asked the guest: "Now,
Lalaji, who do you think are the best India batsmen?" Amarnath
sucked in his breath - for Gavaskar and G. R. Viswanath were also
playing - and bravely answered, "Mohinder, ... Surinder."
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Mumbai runs into 'Laxman Rekha' Next : Palmer packs off Power | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|