|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, October 17, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Next
Stop passing the buck, says Clinton
By Kesava Menon
MANAMA, OCT. 16. The emergency summit meeting called to deal with
the volatile situation in West Asia got under way today at the
Egyptian resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh with the U.S. President,
Mr. Clinton, urging Israeli and Palestinian leaders to stop
blaming each other and instead concentrate on how they could
build a peaceful and stable future for the region.
A few excerpts from the opening remarks made by Mr. Clinton was
about the only information leaking out of the plenary session
that began this afternoon. The Israeli Prime Minister, Mr. Ehud
Barak, and the Palestinian Authority President, Mr. Yasser
Arafat, are attending the summit being hosted by the Egyptian
President, Mr. Hosni Mubarak, with King Hussein of Jordan and the
European Union Foreign Minister, Mr. Javier Solana, also adding
their weight to the deliberations.
Mr. Clinton and Mr. Mubarak are reported to have held separate
bilateral meetings with the Israeli and Palestinian leaders this
morning. Later in his opening remarks, Mr. Clinton pointed out
that while developments over the past two weeks had harmed the
peace process, their very occurrence had shown what the alternate
scenario would be if there was no peace process. It is fairly
obvious, both from whatever information has leaked out so far and
from the logic of circumstances, that Mr. Clinton and the others
would try to persuade Mr. Barak and Mr. Arafat to issue a joint
declaration calling for an end to the violence.
There are reports in the Israeli media that Mr. Clinton would
also like the West Asian leaders to sign up to an agreement to
hold another round of talks on the main issues in contention
beyond the resolution of the conflict that has rocked the region
during the past two and a half weeks.
According to these reports, Mr. Clinton would like these talks to
be held and concluded between the end of the U.S. Presidential
election on Nov. 7 and Nov. 15, the date that the Palestinians
have tentatively set for the declaration of their statehood.
Leaders of the Arab world had reportedly told Mr. Clinton that a
cooling off period was necessary before substantive negotiations
could resume.
A ceasefire agreement to end the latest round of confrontation
will also not make much sense if the substantive negotiations are
not re-started soon. If there is no hope for a resolution of the
issues, and therefore a revived prospect for peace, any ceasefire
would soon expire.
Before Mr. Clinton and the other leaders can get Mr. Barak and
Mr. Arafat to agree to a time-table for substantive negotiations,
they will have to resolve the sharp differences about the methods
to deal with the persisting situation of confrontation.
Some of the mechanical problems, like the withdrawal of Israeli
troops from the vicinity of Palestinian towns or the controlling
of his agitated youth by Mr. Arafat, might be more easily
resolved. But the major difference about the format of an
investigation into the causes of the recent confrontation could
prove difficult to resolve. The Palestinians want an
international commission of enquiry to be constituted to look
into the causes of the conflict while Israel is opposed to the
proposal.
Mr. Clinton is known to prefer a U.S.-led probe team, with
representatives of Israel and Palestine aboard and perhaps
including others as well, that will not only probe the causes but
also serve as a mechanism to ensure that those actually doing the
fighting from either side disengage. The U.S. apparently also
desires that such a mechanism will serve as an instrument to
effect better co-ordination between the security services of
Israel and the Palestinian Authority so that such conflict does
not break out in the future.
One problem in this exercise is that while the U.S. and Israel
appear to have one perspective on the nature of the violence
inherent in West Asia, the Palestinians have another. Israel
especially, and the U.S. to an extent, see recent events as the
aberration that needs to be corrected if possible. The
Palestinians believe, and have increasingly begun to articulate
this belief, that the real violence is being perpetrated by an
Israel which occupies their territory and thereby subjects them
to colonial oppression. For the Palestinians, this insidious and
long-term oppression is the real violence that is being
perpetrated in West Asia.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Next : It was a civilian, says Israel | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|