|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, October 17, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
An open letter
Sir, - With reference to the two-part article ``An open letter to
Bangaru Laxman'' (TheHindu Oct. 10, 11), it is to be stated that
the articles written by Ms. Gail Omvedt and people like Mr.
Kancha Illiah create an impression that the present day Hindu
society is still struck with infirmities (real or imaginary) of
Vedic Age and Manu Dharma.
This is far from truth. It is well-known that the Hindu society
is highly adaptable and readily adjusts itself to changing times.
Articles of the above said writers only serve to increase the
caste and class hatred.
R. S. Sri Rama Murthy,
Hyderabad
Sir, - This refers to the open letter of Ms. Gail Omvedt to Mr.
Bangaru Laxman containing some rhetorical questions.
I have the authority of the late Sri Kripananda Wariaar to say
that Guru Drona did not demand the right thumb of his telepathic
disciple. Ekalavya himself wished to offer some gift to his
revered teacher. The latter then asked for what the disciple
values most in him. Immediately the disciple happily surrenders
his right thumb. Drona could have anticipated this and the likely
consequence of this not happening: Duryodhana would have enlisted
his support offering a kingdom as he did to Karna and it would
have been even more difficult for the Pandavas to survive.
Rama wished to demonstrate that rulers should set an example for
the subjects. So he banished Sita to the forests. He too could
have followed her by abdicating, as he was not a power-seeker,
but stayed in order to be of service to the people. He chose a
life of brahmacharya and austerity instead of remarrying and
enjoying royal comforts. He ate simple food and slept on the bare
floor.
Finally the writer's hunch that Ravana could be the better of
Rama because he did not touch Sita is frivolous. He did not touch
her because of a curse that his heads will shatter into pieces if
he forced himself on a woman.If you believe in one aspect, you
have to believe in the others too.
R. Narasimhan,
Chennai
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Dravidian principles Next : Crorepati programmes | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|