|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, October 17, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
Disturbing aggressiveness
THE DOGGEDNESS WITH which the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief,
Mr. K. S. Sudarshan, has pursued the `swadeshi church' line that
he had gratuitously and presumptuously proposed to Indian
Christians just a week ago is another disturbing indication that
the Sangh means business in its aggressive pushing of its
fundamentalist Hindutva ideology. If this message, which came
loud and clear from the three-day `national security camp' the
RSS had organised at Agra, must be in itself troubling for the
minority communities, the fact that the Union Home Minister, Mr.
L. K. Advani, was very much present when Mr. Sudarshan delivered
his peroration on `cultural nationalism' would only exacerbate
their fears. Given the gameplan of the RSS and the objectives of
the Agra camp, it must have been clear to Mr. Advani, as much as
to everyone else, what to expect from the conclave - a strong
majoritarian tenor. The presence of the country's Home Minister
at such a forum is bound to send a signal to the minorities that
his being there provided some legitimacy and encouragement, if
not implicit support, to the theme espoused at the camp.
Significantly, at the party level, this line had received
enthusiastic endorsement from the BJP general secretary, Mr.
Narendra Modi.
If his Vijayadasami Day message was a primer of sorts on the
theme of an `indigenisation of the church', with the foreign
links projected as the root cause of (what the Sangh Parivar
perceived as) ``anti-national and subversive'' activities, Mr.
Sudarshan's speech at the Agra conclave was in the nature of an
ideological exposition. The burden of his talk, in effect, was
that while the minorities were free to adopt any method of
worship they could not build an identity on the basis of
religion. And the most provocative of his propositions is that
the minority communities could have a ``sense of belonging'' only
when they integrated themselves with the ``culture of the land
(read the Hindu culture)''. To equate patriotism with the
`culture' of the majority community is to strike at the very root
of the multi-cultural mosaic and secular foundation of the Indian
polity and nation-state. And it is rather preposterous for anyone
to speak as if the majority community had an exclusive right over
patriotism or nationalist sentiments. So is the oft-repeated call
of the Sangh Parivar outfits particularly to the Christians and
the Muslims to join the ``national mainstream'' by ``respecting''
and ``recognising'' their Hindu cultural roots.
Taken together with the strident voices raised on the
construction of the Ram temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya
and the six-point `swadeshi' agenda on the economic front
unveiled at the camp, the aggressive anti-minority campaign may
be seen as a strategy by the RSS to put pressure on the BJP
leadership against straying too far from the Hindutva plank due
to compulsions of coalition politics. Any such construction will
be highly misplaced. If anything, the RSS and its political arm,
the BJP, appear to be playing out their respective parts
according to a carefully-drafted script. To be fair, the BJP
leadership has never left anyone in doubt that if the party had
shelved the three key elements of its agenda (construction of the
Ram temple, abrogation of Article 370 and the formulation of a
common civil code) it was only because it lacked the requisite
strength in Parliament. Witness, for instance, the Prime
Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee's speech at a gathering of
Hindutva activists in Staten Island during his recent visit to
the United States where, without mincing words, he said if the
BJP got the majority, they could build the India of their dreams.
The non-BJP partners in the ruling National Democratic Alliance
cannot be oblivious to the insidious game being played out by the
Sangh Parivar and the looming threat thereby to the country's
secular and pluralistic fabric.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : Empowerment through advocacy | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|