|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, October 20, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
A retrograde step
BY BENDING BACKWARDS to please another ally, this time in the
Punjab, the NDA Government has set wrong precedents and added to
the problem on the foodgrains front. The much-touted Punjab
package - Rs. 350 crores in all and a lowering of standards in
procurement - may provide a breather to the crisis-ridden Akali
Government of Mr. Parkash Singh Badal and take the vociferous
farmers off the roads, but it is going to add to the woes of the
Food Corporation of India. It is not surprising that its
chairman, Mr. Bhure Lal, wants to step down. The sub- standard
paddy that will now flood the procurement centres in the food
bowl of the country will only add to the formidable buffer
stocks, to rot in the godowns. By the next season, it would be
dubbed `unfit for human consumption'. Mr. Badal has moved heaven
and earth, the Finance Minister and Breach Candy hospital, to
secure this special relief package to assuage his farmers, who
had effectively blocked all forms of transport by road and rail.
With State elections due next year, Opposition parties had also
joined the farmers in demanding immediate relief from the Centre
and the Chief Minister had to do something to prove himself and
his clout with the NDA. Haryana will demand the same favour.
Leaving aside the cash compensation or relief per se,what raises
serious questions in this package is the move to procure paddy
with damaged, discoloured, sprouted and weeviled grain up to 8
per cent, against the norm of just three per cent. Bowing to the
Punjab lobby, the Centre had already agreed to raise the damage
limit to 7 per cent just two days ago and this has been further
compromised to 8 per cent. Similarly, the moisture content was
being raised to 18 per cent. The other controversial step taken
under pressure from Mr. Badal's Government last month was to
advance the start of procurement for the season. Instead of
waiting till the October 1 launch, paddy procurement was
initiated on September 21 itself because of the unseasonal rain.
As such, substantial stocks of immature grain with a relatively
high moisture content was dumped by the farmers. This was
naturally taken at lower than the Minimum Support Price of Rs.
540 per quintal. Under the new package, the Centre and the State
will compensate some of the loss sustained by the farmers, thanks
to a Rs. 100-crore relief jointly agreed to by the Centre and the
State Government.
It is disturbing to note that procurement standards and
specifications are being lowered for the second time in three
years. Despite the hesitation of the officials in the Food
Ministry and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) in accepting
such low norms, it has been a political decision. It is
unfortunate that public sector undertakings such as the FCI or
the State Trading Corporation (STC) are being forced to
compromise not only on standards, but also in sinking precious
resources in procuring foodgrains and crops which cannot be
issued through the Public Distribution System or sold in the
market. There can be no doubt that so long as these institutions
remain with the Government, they cannot be run efficiently or
profitably. When the private trade refuses to buy up a crop
because of a glut or poor quality, the FCI and the STC are being
forced to intervene and bear the burden for political expediency.
With the Planning Commission and the RBI already concerned about
the spiraling fiscal deficit and subsidies, the Centre could ill
afford to take on this additional burden. Instead of wasting Rs.
350 crores in such relief, the Centre could use the assistance to
promote better crop planning and the production of pulses for
instance. In the present agricultural scenario, a lot of
rethinking on crops may be imperative without compromising on
food security. At any rate, such sell-outs to State Governments
run by alliance partners have to stop sometime.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Proceeding with caution Next : What is a 'national' party? | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|