|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, December 11, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Sri Lanka faces bleak economy, to meet donors
By Nirupama Subramanian
COLOMBO, DEC. 10. Sri Lanka will go into a crucial meeting with
donor countries later this month against the background of a
gloomy outlook for the country's economy that speculation about
peace talks with the LTTE has done nothing to lift.
The Deputy Finance Minister, Mr. G.L. Peiris, has told the State-
run Sunday Observer that the focus of the meeting to be held on
December 18 and 19, will be the rehabilitation of the embattled
north, poverty alleviation and good governance.
The Sri Lankan President, Mrs. Chandrika Kumaratunga, may also
attend the Paris aid-group meeting with donor countries, where,
it is expected, she will face pressure to quickly begin talks
with the LTTE.
The LTTE leader, Mr. Velupillai Prabhakaran, last month accused
the international community of funding the Sri Lankan
Government's war against him.
``It is because of the massive financial aid obtained from donor
countries that Sri Lanka can continue this war against the
Tamils,'' he said in his annual `Heroes' Day' speech.
It was in the same speech that the LTTE leader offered peace
talks. Last week, Mr. Peiris faced questions from diplomats of
the Paris group donor countries on how the Government would
respond to this offer. He said the Government was ``ready to take
the bull by the horns''.
``We are at the threshold of a historic period. We have to take
difficult decisions and we will not shirk them,'' he reportedly
said.
His remarks, and the prolonged stay of the President in the U.K.,
have fuelled speculation that peace talks may be around the
corner, even though there are few positive signs yet.
The weekly Sunday Leader said today that the LTTE's Mr. Anton
Balasingham had unofficially conveyed to the Sri Lankan
Government the demand he made at a Tamil public meeting in London
last month, that talks could not begin till Colombo lifted the
ban on the group, and stopped lobbying Western nations also to
proscribe it. The newspaper said the Government's demand that the
LTTE publicly declare it had given up its demand for Eelam
constituted another snag.
If the defence outlay for the first four months of 2001 is any
indication, the Government is not being overly optimistic about
chances of peace. An interim budget for January to April 2001,
passed in Parliament last week, allocated Sri Lankan Rs. 26
billions ($ 1=SLRs 83) for defence spending, which is 20 per cent
of total spending for that period.
Sri Lanka's defence expenditure rose dramatically after an
escalation in the war against the LTTE in mid-2000, turning the
initial allocation of Rs. 52.4 billions for this year upside
down, and sending it soaring over the $ 1 billion mark.
Mr. Peiris said in Parliament earlier this week that the
unforeseen escalation had resulted in a bigger budget deficit
than the projected 7.6 per cent. The revised estimate is now 8.7
per cent.
Recent weeks have seen the Government borrowing frantically to
pay off oil bills and prop up its defence spending, putting
pressure on interest rates, currently at over 20 per cent, up
from 12.5 per cent at the beginning of this year.
The rising interest rates forced the Government to come out with
denials of rumours of the economy's imminent collapse. The
country has adequate reserves. Sri Lanka's central bank said last
week that the projected growth rate for 2000 was 6.1 per cent,
against 4.3 per cent last year.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : 'Britain to freeze Benazir's assets' Next : Australia's stress on Asia-Pacific ties | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|