|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, January 05, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Pressure mounting on Govt. to respond to LTTE ceasefire
By Nirupama Subramanian
COLOMBO, JAN. 4. Pressure is growing on Sri Lanka to respond
quickly to the LTTE's call for talks with the growing view that
the rebel group has stolen the moral high ground from the
Government through its unilateral ceasefire.
The Peace Support Group (PSG), a body of academics, professional
and social activists, today said the LTTE's poor track record was
insufficient reason for the Government not to seize the
opportunity offered by the group for negotiations.
``De-escalation leading to ceasefire is an indispensable
component of any meaningful process that aims at a negotiated
settlement and the resolution of the causes that has led to the
present protracted and bloody armed conflict,'' the PSG said in a
statement.
It did not expect either party to trust the other side, the
presence of an international facilitator could aid in building
mutual confidence and commitment, the PSG added.
The National Peace Council appealed to the Government to swiftly
utilise the potential created by the ceasefire for the de-
escalation and de-militarisation of the conflict.
``Whatever the motivations behind a ceasefire offer may be, even
in the midst of mutual distrust between both parties to this
conflict, it is not to be lightly rejected. It offers a new space
and a new opportunity for non-violent forward movement towards
peace talks,'' it said in a statement.
Eleven Tamil parties, including those with parliamentary
representation in the troubled north-east, said on Wednesday they
would begin a nation-wide campaign to bring pressure on the
Government to reciprocate the ceasefire.
The perception among those favouring quick peace talks is that
despite the rhetoric on both sides that appears to be taking them
along two parallel tracks with no divergence in sight, in
actuality, the positions of the Government and the LTTE on
negotiations have never been so close but that accumulated
mistrust is clouding reason and preventing them from coming
together.
The PSG said that particularly encouraging was the acceptance by
both parties of the broad parameters set out by the mutually-
accepted Norwegian facilitators, that a political solution to
Tamil aspirations had to be found within the framework of a
united Sri Lanka.
The Norwegian peace envoy, Mr. Erik Solheim, conveyed this to the
LTTE leader, Mr. Velupillai Prabhakaran, in person last November.
Though Mr. Prabhakaran is reported to have not made any response
to this, the fact that did not leave the room either is cited as
evidence that for whatever reason, he may be willing to consider
a non-Eelam solution.
The pro-talks lobby believes that the Government must seize and
build upon this for an early political resolution.
But at each stage of the process that began with the Solheim-
Prabhakaran meeting on November 1, the Government has been seen
as groping for an appropriate response. In particular, many are
surprised by the Government's military operations during the
LTTE's unilateral ceasefire.
It is believed that the return of the Sri Lankan President, Mrs.
Chandrika Kumaratunga, after a long absence from the country may
revitalise the peace process in the coming days. There are also
high expectations of Norway, and in this respect, there is a
build-up of anticipation around Mr. Solheim's next visit to Sri
Lanka, which could be as early as next week.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Peres coming next week Next : Gen. Powell to be briefed on S. Asia | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|