|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, January 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
Kilshaws turn hate objects
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, JAN. 23. Until two weeks ago, nobody outside their
neighbourhood had even heard of the Kilshaws, a middle-aged and
rather grumpy couple who lived with their three children in a
non-descript Welsh village.
Today, they are two of the best known faces in the United
Kingdom, reviled by the tabloids, despised as much by the
conservatives as by the liberals and sought after by TV channels
for rights to their ``story''.
So, what is their story, and what has made them famous - or, more
accurately, famously infamous? Alan and Judith Kilshaw did what
hundreds of couples across the world are probably doing every day
but they made the mistake of boasting about it, and their lives
are now in a shambles. They bought twin babies on the net and
then drove 2,000 miles across America to escape another couple,
Richard and Vickie Allen, to whom the children had been
originally sold by their mother, Tranda Wecker, through a fly-by-
night child adopting agency.
To begin from the beginning: the six-month-old twins, Belinda and
Kimberley, were first sold to the Allens of California for the
equivalent of £ 4,000 but two months after they had stayed
with them, they were tricked into returning them to their mother
who sold them to the Kilshaws - then holidaying in America - for
a little over £ 8,000. When the Allens got to know of it,
they were furious and demanded the twins back but the Kilshaws
told them to mind their own business. And while they were trading
charges, the woman who ran the adoption agency through which the
Allens had bought the babies disappeared. As the Kilshaws drove
away with the children, the Allens apparently gave them a hot
chase but the British couple managed to give them the slip and
caught a flight to Manchester.
Even as they thought they were home and dry, disaster was waiting
to happen. And it happened on January 16. The Sun, which got a
whiff of it, went to town with the story of the ``immoral''
couple (that was the sense of the story) who had bought children
on the net, triggering a wave of moral outrage. The Kilshaws
insisted that they had not bought but adopted the twins - the
money they had paid were adoption-related charges, they said -
but this did not square up with their earlier boast of how they
had paid £ 8,000 for them. TV channels went into overdrive
with the Kilshaws in Wales and Allens in California brought
``face to face'' on a ``live'' debate hooked across the Atlantic.
The Prime Minister, Mr. Tony Blair, called it ``disgusting'' and
promised to outlaw such adoptions; the twins' natural mother was
seen and heard on a U.S. TV channel saying she wanted her
children back; the Kilshaws had a field day as they addressed
press conferences, gave interviews and posed with the twins,
saying they were now inseparable - until one evening the Social
Care Services swooped on the hotel where they were staying and
took away the twins.
The twins are now in official care, the Kilshaws are crying
hoarse that it is not fair and have decided to challenge the
decision, the Government has said it would toughen laws relating
to overseas adoption and crack down on websites offering children
for adoption, women columnists have their hands full with demands
for opinion pieces, an The Sun has come up with the story that
Judith Kilshaw is a witch! Which she has, of course, denied - and
meanwhile, everyone is wondering why a middle aged couple with
their own children should be going to such lengths to adopt other
people's babies.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Palestinian report discredits U.S. mediation | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|