|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, January 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
'Third group' for AICC-CWC norms
By Our Special Correspondent
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JAN. 23. The `third group' in the State
Congress today joined issue in the current debate between the
senior leaders, Mr. K. Karunakaran and Mr. A.K. Antony, over the
allocation of tickets to candidates for the ensuing Assembly
elections by bluntly opposing candidates' selection on the basis
of group affiliation and quota system.
Demanding implementation of the AICC-CWC norms for candidates'
selection, Mr. Ramesh Chennithala and Mr. G. Karthikeyan, senior
leaders of the `third group', placed a four- point charter for a
debate. Mr. Chennithala said the victory chances of candidates
should be one of the main yardsticks. Besides, more consideration
should be given to youth on the basis of their organisational
capabilities, leadership qualities and contribution to democratic
struggles and functional background.
``We are opposed to giving party tickets on the basis of the
excessive interests of any leader or on the basis of the
candidates' loyalty to such a leader. We are against giving
tickets to youth who are not presentable and acceptable to the
public,'' they said.
The two leaders pointed out that they were compelled to state
their positions in the context of the public debate initiated by
the senior leaders themselves. ``We earnestly request the senior
leaders to observe self-restraint in their comments especially on
the eve of the Assembly elections when the prospects of the UDF
winning were brightest,'' they said.
It was the responsibility of the Congress, being the major
partner in the UDF, to channelise the anti-Government sentiments.
``A strong political process, centered around an anti-LDF
movement, is on. The senior leaders should work towards
instilling people's confidence in the party and the UDF and their
leadership.''
They said that all this while, the `third group' had remained
silent for the sake of internal peace in the party, at times even
at the cost of facing insults. ``The fight is between two strong
political fronts. Instead of inviting public attention on the
unpopular LDF Government, it was highly undemocratic on the part
of a section in the party to utilise the occasion to display
their relative strength and influence by hitting out at the
opponents,'' they said.
In reply to a question, they said they were compelled to join the
debate over party tickets, but were responding only in a positive
way. ``If the current debate leads to a positive development,
then we wholeheartedly welcome it,'' they said.
They said there should not be any bar on fielding candidates who
had been consistently winning a particular Assembly seat, unless
the party leadership felt that the services of such a person
could be utilised elsewhere. Similarly, it would be unfair to
deny tickets to consistent losers, without analysing the reasons
for their defeat or their public acceptance, they said.
Asked whether the `third group' was afraid of being sidelined in
the sweepstakes, the two leaders said it was impossible to
alienate any one in the party. Mr. Chennithala, in reply to a
question on the UDF leadership issue, categorically stated that
Mr. Antony was the leader of the UDF. Mr. Karthikeyan
supplemented his statement by stating that the question of the
UDF leadership was irrelevant at a time when the message was very
clear that Mr. Antony would be the leader. ``He has led the UDF
as Chief Minister, then as the Leader of the Opposition and now
he is soon embarking on a major campaign from Kasaragod against
the LDF misrule. The message is very clear. And the debate over
the leadership was irrelevant,'' he said.
Mr. Karthikeyan said he had strong differences with Mr.
Karunakaran regarding his observations about the functioning of
the Opposition in the last four and odd years. ``Except for the
technical lapse of not bringing in a no-confidence motion, the
Opposition had relentlessly and effectively functioned in the
Assembly,'' he said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : KDA moots preference for Kannada students Next : Collectors to find land for FRIENDS | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|