|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, January 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
KERC chief leaves it to KPTCL
By Our Staff Reporter
BANGALORE, JAN. 23. ``Law-makers themselves cannot break the law
and punish others for doing so,'' the Karnataka Electricity
Regulatory Commission (KERC) Chairman, Mr. Philipose Mathai, said
on Tuesday.
Mr. Mathai was speaking on ``KERC directives in tariff revision''
at the Power Engineers' Day function organised by the KEB
Engineers' Association (KEBEA).
His comment amounted to an indirect criticism of the Government's
recent stay on KERC's power tariff orders issued last month.
Mr. Mathai said the commission had been set up by the Government
through implementing the Karnataka Electricity Reforms Act. The
commission directives were issued ``keeping the Reforms Act in
mind'', he said.
Mr. Mathai stressed the KERC did not have to justify its work.
``We have done our duty. It is up to the licensee, in this case
the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), to
implement them (the tariff orders),'' he said. The regulations
were ``binding on the licensee''.
He was at pains to explain the legality of the commission's
existence and the legitimacy of its orders and even delved into
the Western origin of the regulator concept. ``The regulator was
formed because governments felt the need for autonomous,
independent bodies to take apolitical decisions in a balanced
manner keeping in mind the interests of the stake holders,
investor and the consumers,'' he said.
In the U.K. (United Kingdom), the basic brief (of the regulator)
was on de-regularisation or de-monopolisation while in India, the
thrust was on attracting investment. And as regards its legality,
Mr. Mathai said the legislature had given it the authority to
regulate and ``unless these powers are retracted by law, the
regulator can issue directives''.
Moreover, if the legislature amended the law, the regulator could
work within the purview of the amended law but ``no law-maker or
commission could violate the law,'' he said.
Mr. Mathai regretted that there had been poor response from
organisations such as the KEBEA to KERC regulations and its
discussion papers. ``Kindly respond or we will consider your
silence as agreement to our directions,'' he said.
He believed that there had been insufficient discussion on the
structural change of the power sector. And there was still a
lingering fear because the Orissa experiment (in power sector
privatisation) had not done well. ``You have not given your
judgment on the proposed plans for unbundling and
privatisation,'' he said. He hoped that the KEBEA would debate on
the issue.
He concluded by urging them to come up with concrete suggestions
and not to ``let bureaucrats do the suggestion-making''.
Mr. V.P.Baligar, KPTCL Chairman and Managing Director, stressed
that the it was ```committed and sincere'' in its efforts to
implement the KERC orders. He gave examples where some directives
were ``beyond our control because of problems of logistics, lack
of funds and manpower''.
For instance, the KERC had asked the KPTCL to publish merit order
despatches. This went against the State Government's directives
on procurement of supplies where preference had to be given to
public sector undertakings. ``If we stop giving preference to
PSUs such as Kavika and NGEF who manufacture good quality
material, they will have to close down,'' he said.
The Government would have to file a review petition on this
aspect, he said and urged the KERC to be more understanding of
the KPTCL's problems and to show it how to overcome those
obstacles.
Mr. Baligar said he had asked the Government to set up district-
level committees headed by the Deputy Commissioner and comprising
the Superintendent of Police, the zilla panchayat Chief Executive
Officer and the Executive Engineer to help the KPTCL in revenue
collection. ``Some districts are agitating against paying KPTCL
dues therefore we need the DC's support,'' he explained.
Mr. K.C.Naikwadi, KEBEA President, and Mr. H.R.Gopal, KERC Member
Technical, were present.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Move to promote technology incubators Next : 'Cryogenic engine by next year' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|