|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, January 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
MCH deaf to noise pollution?
By K. Srinivas Reddy
HYDERABAD, JAN. 23. Strange but true. Rules framed by the Centre
for checking noise pollution have been rendered ineffective for
want of a formal notification to be issued by the Municipal
Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH).
Be it the ear-splitting air horns or the high-decibel sound
systems in a cinema theatre, much discussion has taken place on
the increasing level of noise pollution in the city. But, nothing
concrete has been done to check the menace, which has been
`silently' affecting every citizen in this city.
The non-implementation of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and
Control) Rules, promulgated by the Centre under the Environment
(Protection) Act, is being traced to two major factors. The non-
availability of equipment to determine the level of noise emitted
from a source, and of course, a formal notification by the MCH
demarcating various zones in the city.
At least one hurdle for implementation of rules seems to have
been overcome with the city police initiating the process to
acquire 10 pieces of noise measuring equipment. ``We will shortly
get the equipment,'' the Commissioner of Police, Mr. P. Ramulu,
disclosed here on Tuesday. The city police is spending about Rs.
1 lakh for procuring these Taiwan-made instruments. But, even
these cannot be used unless the MCH notified the zones in the
city.
``We have written to the MCH in October last asking them to
demarcate the zonal boundaries. But, we have not been intimated
about any follow-up action so far,'' the DCP (Traffic), Mr. M.V.
Dinakar Prasad, said. Technically, the twin cities have to be
divided into industrial, commercial, residential and silent
zones, for which different decibel (dB) limits are prescribed
during day and night timings. A formal notification to this
effect has to be issued by the MCH before the rules can be
implemented.
According to the rules notified by the State Government, the
noise level should be within the limits of 75 dB in day and 70 dB
in night in industrial area, 65 dB in day and 55 dB in night in
commercial areas, 55 dB in day and 45 dB in residential areas and
50 dB in day and 40 dB in nights in silent zones. A silent zone
is defined as an area comprising 100 metres around educational
institutions, hospitals and court buildings.
The rules stipulate that the Road Transport Authority shall
ensure that no vehicle shall be registered or its registration
renewed ``unless the horn fitted in the vehicles meets the
prescribed standards''. The rules also stipulate that there shall
be no rattling noises from the body of the vehicles.
An interesting clause in the rule is that no audio system within
the vehicle should produce noise of more than 75 dB at a two-
metre distance from the vehicle. ``The audio systems of vehicles
shall not be heard more than seven metres away from the
vehicles.'' The multi-toned horns or accessories for audio
alarms, indicators providing noise are also to be checked by the
RTA.
Those violating these rules are liable to be imposed a fine of
Rs. 1,000 for the first offence, Rs. 2,000 for the subsequent
offence. For the second offense, the vehicle mounted audio system
or accessories can be removed and confiscated in addition to the
other penalties. Under section 15 of the Environment (Protection)
Act, a `proven offender' can be punished with imprisonment for a
term extending upto five years with fine which could extend up to
Rs. 1 lakh or with both.
In case of continuation of the contravention, the additional fine
could be Rs. 5,000 per every day, and if the contravention
continued beyond a period of one year and after the date of
conviction, the offender is punishable with imprisonment for a
term extending up to seven years.
Police officers say noise pollution could be contained to a large
extent if only the rules could be implemented. But for an
inexplicable reason, the town planning officials of the MCH chose
not to demarcate the zones despite the order G.O.Rt. No. 227
issued on July 11, 2000, ostensibly `coming into force with
immediate effect'. Surprisingly, without realising that the rules
cannot be enforced because of non-demarcation of zones, circulars
and memoranda are routinely forwarded by the DGP office to
Superintendents of Police and Commissioners of Police asking them
to ``ensure the strict implementation of the above act and
rules''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : 'Upkeep in Salar Jung Museum far below European standards' Next : MCH urged to keep surroundings clean | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|