|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, January 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Blair loses an ally
LIKE THE MILLENNIUM Dome, the symbol that the ruling New Labour
had intended to impress the world with, Mr. Peter Mandelson,
hailed as the pivotal figure in the party's successful attempt to
woo middle England, has just been relegated to oblivion. Even if,
ironically, the connection between the dome and Mr. Mandelson is
not far- fetched as it turns out, there must be shock that the
high-profile Minister, also known as a ``sinister minister'',
should have been forced out over what on the face of it appeared
like an insignificant political act. The apparent sin for which
his Prime Minister chose to sacrifice his most trusted lieutenant
was that he made a representation to the Home Office on how
certain wealthy, non-British political friends might go about
gaining British citizenship. The former Minister responsible for
the Dome was doing something every parliamentarian in every
democracy does in routine fashion. Besides, the risks of
provoking a scandal were minimal in this case since the friends
were well connected across the British political spectrum. Mr.
Mandelson, however, reckoned without two factors which have
ultimately nipped a rich political career in the bud. The first
and more decisive factor was that his new Labour is planning to
go for elections this summer in the run-up to which any
impropriety, perceived or real, could prove disastrous. Second,
the friends for whom he interceded, the Hindujas, were facing
prosecution in their home country and had been denied British
citizenship once, a decade ago. Compounding the issues was the
way political opponents linked the grant of citizenship to Mr.
Srichand Hinduja to the handsome donation the family gave for
underwriting the cost of the Faith Zone in the Millennium Dome,
the ruling party's pet project which has been abandoned as a
massive failure. It was this perceived link between the donation
and the grant of citizenship which triggered the chain of events
leading to Mr. Mandelson's resignation. As expected, both sides
have denied the alleged link.
At a time when apathy and indifference, rather than the Tories in
impatient opposition, were the biggest problems faced by the
ruling new Labour, it was indeed a surprise that the party should
have inflicted another wound on itself as it prepares to plunge
into a general election campaign. The manner in which Mr.
Mandelson, considered an architect of the party's stunning
landslide victory three years ago, has been forced out of office
a second time clearly rules out another comeback. It also
reflects a face of the Prime Minister, Mr. Tony Blair, that he
had not often displayed: a ruthlessness and efficiency in damage
control, and a readiness to jettison a liability. The departure
of Mr. Mandelson - he also ceases to be coordinator of the
party's campaign - must nevertheless be a blow to Mr. Blair so
near the expected election. Mr. Mandelson's downfall will be
welcome news to the many enemies he had made within the party in
his short political career and will strengthen the position of
the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr. Gordon Brown, a prospective
contender for the Prime Ministership who found himself sidelined
by the more savvy Blair spin doctor.
With the Tory leadership and its programme failing to catch the
British voters' fancy, there is no lurking danger that Mr. Blair
will be evicted from Downing Street this summer if he chooses to
go for elections. But the Ulster peace process, now at a critical
stage, and Mr. Blair's campaign for closer integration within the
European Union may both suffer setbacks with the departure of Mr.
Mandelson. Together with the need for adjustments in the trans-
Atlantic equations necessitated by the second version of the Bush
administration, the year ahead can bring its own challenges in
international relations.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Valid concern Next : Can Jharkhand be different? | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|