|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, February 01, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
More on fuel economy
MOTORING MATTERS (in last week's `Small is truly beautiful')
looked at the main problems with the use of private motor
vehicles on Indian roads and suggested some measures to
ameliorate them. To recap, these problems are: rapidly increasing
congestion and pollution as well as the increasing use of
imported petroleum. It was suggested that encouraging the use of
smaller vehicles would help tackle all these problems. Japan has
successfully used a similar strategy.
An alternative strategy is to classify vehicles according to
their fuel efficiency (or fuel consumption) and use that as a
basis for taxing them. This is because fuel consumption and size
(or weight) have a fairly close correlation, barring some
exceptions. One advantage of such a scheme is that it is easy to
administer and less open to abuse.
We could use the Indian National Driving Cycle that is already
used to test vehicles for their pollution levels as a basis for
measuring fuel consumption under typical Indian conditions. These
measurements could be carried out by ARAI, Pune or VDRE,
Ahmednagar which already have the necessary facilities.
A possible duty structure for petrol and diesel driven three and
four wheeled vehicles is shown below. The duty structure for
diesel vehicles is slightly "stiffer" because, under the
administered price mechanism, diesel is artificially cheaper than
petrol. On the other hand, the duties on vehicles, petrol or
diesel, that meet Euro III, or equivalent, emission norms could
be reduced by 5 per cent in each category. Similarly, the duties
on vehicles factory-fitted with CNG fuel systems could be reduced
by 5 per cent because of their clean running.
On differentials
Numerous readers of this column have asked me what a differential
is. The last straw, as far as I am concerned, was when a nephew
of mine who has an engineering degree asked the same question!!
So here goes...
Historically, the invention of the differential is usually
attributed to the Frenchman Onesiphore Pecqueur, who in 1828
patented a steam vehicle that included a differential gear on the
driving axle to help it easily negotiate corners. Why? When a
vehicle with two or more wheels on an axle goes around a curve,
the outer wheels travel a greater distance than the inner ones by
rotating faster. Common sense shows that if they 'free wheel',
there is no problem. If they are driven, however, they will tend
to skid because the outer wheel is prevented from rotating faster
than the inner one. Fitting a 'differential' divides the torque
(turning force) equally between the two driven wheels, regardless
of their relative speeds of rotation and stops the skidding.
The ordinary differential, on the other hand, is at a
disadvantage when equal traction is not available to both driven
wheels, typically when one is on a loose or slippery surface.
That is when one needs a limited slip differential of the kind
fitted to a Tata Safari.
Four wheel drive vehicles are capable off-road and under other
difficult conditions albeit at the expense of added cost,
complication and fuel consumption. More often than not, however,
only two wheels need to be driven when it is obviously desirable
that the others free wheel saving power and fuel and reducing
wear and tear. The early Willys Jeeps and their Mahindra
successors did not come with free wheeling front hubs unlike the
Maruti Gypsies which came with them as standard, but the change
to a wider track in the mid 1990s saw their unfortunate
withdrawal.
Mr. Sunil Subbiah, a Bangalore based automobile enthusiast and
industrialist, designs and manufactures selectable free wheeling
hubs for Gypsies and Mahindra jeeps that can be retrofitted by
any easily competent mechanic. Fitting these hubs should improve
the power and fuel consumption of most four wheel drive vehicles
by about 10 per cent in typical usage.
Manmohan Reddy
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : WTO: Can it inspire confidence? Next : Companies Amendment Act 2000 v 1999 Bill | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|