|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, February 22, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Other steps must follow, say parties
By Neena Vyas
NEW DELHI, FEB. 21. The Government decision to extend ceasefire
in Jammu and Kashmir today was made easier with party leaders
across the political divide virtually giving their prior
approval. But not before warning that continuous extension cannot
be an end in itself, and that the Government must take other
political, economic and diplomatic initiatives simultaneously to
effectively convert the ceasefire into a meaningful peace
initiative.
The parties' green signal for yet another extension was given,
but not without criticising the Government handling of the
situation. The Government must ensure security of the common man,
who has paid the price with increased number of civilian deaths
during the three-month ceasefire, it should initiate a dialogue
with the people and those who represent them and not only with
militants, and it must think about an internal dialogue on
greater autonomy for the State.
Thirty leaders representing 21 parties discussed for over
two-and-a-half hours the issue of the ceasefire extension at a
meeting called by the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee.
The Prime Minister said he had listened ``carefully'' to the
party leaders and would consider their view when taking a
decision later at the meeting of the Cabinet Committee on
Security Affairs in the evening.
After a 35-minute presentation by intelligence agencies on the
ground realities in the State, the Home Minister, Mr. L. K.
Advani, gave the Government's perception - the ceasefire was
welcomed by the people of the State and praised by the
international community even as Pakistan had been isolated.
However, militants had struck several times and civilian deaths
had increased during the ceasefire period, he admitted.
A cryptic remark by the Leader of the Opposition, Ms. Sonia
Gandhi, at the end, summed it up. ``The meeting was a government
briefing on the positive effects of the ceasefire. They asked for
an endorsement, we gave it.'' The CPI(M)'s Mr. Somnath Chatterji
expressed dissatisfaction thus: ``Ceasefire for what? There has
been no dialogue, no initiative to normalise the situation. The
question of more autonomy for Kashmir needs to be looked at, and
talk of trifurcation of the state coming from certain quarters
should be stopped.''
Perhaps the strongest indictment came from the RJD leader, Mr.
Raghuvansh Prasad Singh: ``Had the Government thought of
consulting the Opposition at this late stage because there were
serious differences on the issue of extension of ceasefire within
the Cabinet? Would the Government talk to the Sangh Parivar which
has been making dangerous demands for the trifurcation of the
state?'' Mr. P. A. Pandian of the AIADMK listed the attacks at
the Red Fort, the Police Control Room in Srinagar, the attempt on
Dr. Farooq Abdullah's life and the threat held out to the PMO.
There had been no positive response from Pakistan's military
ruler, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, he added.
The allies and supporting parties led by Mr. K. Yerran Naidu of
the Telugu Desam Party, were softer on the Government, saying the
results had been ``satisfactory'', and that there was a need for
another extension to consolidate the gains made. The BJP leader,
Mr. V. K. Malhotra, wanted the Government to ensure the security
of ``pro-India elements in Kashmir, including a sizeable number
in the majority Muslim community'' as they were ``obvious
targets'' of militant attacks. The Government should effectively
counter Pakistan's propaganda, he said adding there could not be
any ceasefire against foreign militants terrorising the State.
The National Conference leader, Mr. Abdul Shaheen, said his party
was the first to talk about the need to discuss greater autonomy,
and that today, civilians in the State were being targeted by
``both sides,'' an unambiguous reference to the firing on
civilian demonstrators by security forces. In any dialogue
``patriotic and nationalist forces'' such as the NC must be
included.
The CPI(ML), which was not invited to the meeting, later said,
``if custodial deaths continue and killers in uniform are not
brought to book'', the ceasefire would remain an eyewash.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : U.S. may lift sanctions soon Next : Napster makes a billion-dollar offer | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|