|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, February 22, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Cosmetic changes likely in sanctions on Iraq
By Kesava Menon
MANAMA (BAHRAIN), FEB. 21. Iraq has described U.S. and British
proposals to review and if necessary, change the existing system
of sanctions as ``poison'', but this response was predictable
since Iraq is preparing for comprehensive talks with the U.N. on
this issue. What would be more interesting to see is whether the
U.S. and its ally are only working on cosmetic changes to reduce
the widespread criticism of their hardline stance towards Iraq.
According to the reports, the U.S. and Britain are to consider
the ways by which they can more effectively ensure that Iraq is
never able to re-build a weapon of mass destruction capability.
They are also seeking ways to ensure that the Iraqi regime is
permanently deprived of the ability to commit aggression against
its own people or against other countries of the region. It is
envisaged that these steps to ratchet up the pressure on the
Iraqi regime will be accompanied by measures to ease the general
economic sanctions that have caused so much hardship to the Iraqi
people. The U.S. and British officials are expected to discuss
these matters tomorrow ahead of the meeting between the U.S.
President, Mr. George W Bush and the British Prime Minister, Mr.
Tony Blair on Friday.
Theoretically, it should be possible to refine the policy so as
to make the application of sanctions more targeted and specific.
There is already a system in place for countries around the world
to notify the U.N. about any sales or exports to Iraq and a U.N.
committee supervises all purchases by Iraq. In the context it
might be only a matter of requiring strict reporting of the sale
of weapons, weapons materiel or dual use technologies. No
systemic change will really be required but international co-
operation might be more forthcoming if the world community
perceived that the only objective was that of ensuring that Iraq
does not re-develop a WMD capability or build up such a
capability as to be a threat to its neighbours.
There is far more widespread support for the view that the Iraqi
President, Mr. Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to get his
hands on weapons of mass destruction since he is known to have
used them before. It is also theoretically possible to ease the
general economic sanctions without dismantling the supervisory
mechanism. The U.N. has a system of ``pre-approval'' as per which
trade in specific items do not need to be routed through the
supervisory mechanism. It should be possible to broaden the list
of items in the ``pre-approval'' list and remove the restrictions
on the Iraqi consumers and international suppliers of these
items.
According to some reports, Iraqi private traders will also be
allowed to trade more freely with Jordan and other neighbouring
States. However, the plan to interdict dual use materiel and
technologies can still create problems. In the past, the
sanctions monitoring committee has even stopped the import of
pencils into Iraq on the grounds that the lead in them could be
put to dual uses.
The Iraqis have made credible claims that the U.S. and U.K. have
used their role in the sanctions monitoring mechanism to conjure
the devil out of the details in order to interdict all manner of
agreements. The supervisory mechanism is after all a bureaucratic
process and it is difficult to ascertain what is going into it
and what is coming out.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Barak not to join Sharon Cabinet Next : FBI assessing fallout of deception | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|