|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, February 22, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
FMCG industry's initiative to protect brands
By Our Corporate Reporter
CHENNAI, FEB. 21. Leading FMCG manufacturers feel that the
existence of a large number of counterfeit and pass(look-alike)
products of popular brands are a sad reflection of the state of
trademark protection in the country.
Favourite brands such as Parle-G, Fair and Lovely, Tiger
Biscuits, Dairy Milk, Perk and Ariel are duplicated and sold with
names such as Paile G or Party G, `Pure & Lovely' or `Flair &
Lovely' and similar sounding names.
A study conducted by AcNielsen, the market research agency,
indicates that on an average, the loss to the government in sales
tax from such spurious products is 10 per cent, in excise duty 15
per cent, in octroi 2 per cent and in income tax 45 per cent. The
minimum loss to the government is placed at Rs. 830 crores, and
to the FMCG industry Rs. 2,500 crores in a year.
But a more disturbing impact of these fake products is on
consumers' health. Adulterated products, particularly in the food
and drug categories can be dangerous. In most cases, these
spurious products are produced under unhygienic conditions and
without proper technical supervision. The ingredients used are
not of standard quality or quantity and do not provide the
benefits of the established brands and even lead to undesirable
side effects. The spurious products have the same MRP as genuine
brands. The dealer in such cases buys look-alike products cheaply
and sells them at the genuine product prices.
The manufacturers have been countering such practices through the
legal process. To bring some order in the battle of defending
consumer rights as well as to launch a unified defence against
these spurious product manufacturers, the Federation of Chambers
of Commerce and Industry has set up a special brand protection
committee(BPC). This committee will not only assist these
companies by providing actionable information, but also take
actions directly on categories where the menace of counterfeit
and pass off products is more, according to P & G release.
At present, the BPC has members from P & G, HLL, Nirma, Colgate,
Marico, SmithKline Beecham, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Gillette,
Britannia and others. The market research company, AcNielsen and
consumer activist groups such as CERC, Ahmedabad, are also on the
committee. The chairman of BPC, Mr. Bharat Patel says, ``The
mission of the BPC is to collaborate with government authorities,
industry and trade associations, corporates and consumer bodies
to eliminate counterfeit and pass-off products.'' Mr. Patel, who
is also the chairman of Procter & Gamble commented
``Counterfeiting harms the companies manufacturing genuine
products of high quality and sales loss is tremendous. There is
also obvious damage to the genuine brands' image among consumers
and their goodwill is also eroded.''
In its mission, the BPC is adopting a four-pronged strategy -
advocate more effective enforcement of existing laws and rules;
measure and publicise the negative impact of counterfeits and
pass-offs; take action against infringers via regulatory
authorities; and open communication channels between stakeholders
to generate awareness and stimulate action.
The BPC has set up a website, www.fake-busters.com to spread
awareness on the subject, provide actionable information to all
the stakeholders and enrol consumers and authorities in the fight
against counterfeit and pass-off products.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : RIL signs MoA for LNG project in Iran Next : Monitor | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|