|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, March 25, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Erik Solheim bets on peace
By Nirupama Subramanian
COLOMBO, MARCH 24. Mr. Erik Solheim, Norwegian special envoy who
has been trying to bring the Sri Lanka Government and the LTTE to
the negotiating table, said reports that New Delhi had recently
told the Sri Lankan Government that Norway should restrict itself
to a facilitatory role, and not become a mediator, were
``untrue''. He pointed out that Norway was assisting Sri Lanka
``because we are asked to do so by the sovereign Government of
that country and by the LTTE.''
Questions have been raised in Sri Lanka about Norway's role after
peace talks begin. Mr. Solheim, speaking to The Hindu from Oslo,
said that would be decided by those who are party to the
conflict. ``We will assist to the extent that the Government and
the LTTE find useful. We will never do more. We will try not to
disappoint anyone by doing less. We are not in any business of
peace enforcement, only offering our services as long as the
parties so wish,'' he said. The special envoy said there was
``room for optimism'' that the peace initiative was headed in the
right direction, but cautioned that the process was ``fragile and
vulnerable''.
Mr. Solheim said the aspects of the process that gave hope were
the clear indications by the President, Ms. Chandrika
Kumaratunga, that she stood for a negotiated settlement and was
ready for peace talks, and the LTTE ceasefire because of which
there had been no attacks in southern Sri Lanka since his meeting
with Mr. Velupillai Prabhakaran last November.
``The LTTE has also refrained from making the demand that there
should be a withdrawal of troops from the Jaffna peninsula as a
precondition for talks.'' But, he said, there was lack of trust
between the two sides. Plus, the situation on the ground was
``tense, and therefore fragile''.
Norway was working towards building confidence between the two
sides, but in the spirit of confidentiality with which Oslo has
approached its mission in Sri Lanka, Mr. Solheim refused to say
what measures to this end were being discussed. He declined
comment on the LTTE's recent renewal of the truce or its threat
to terminate it if the Government did not reciprocate, saying the
Norwegian duty was to find common ground between the LTTE and the
Government, and not to dwell on issues on which there were
differences between them.
On the recent military confrontations between the two sides, he
said, ``Any developments in the battlefield to us are reasons to
speed up the peace process, to reduce future suffering''. Mr.
Solheim said he could not make any predictions on when peace
talks would commence but said considering the loss of life and
property, and the money spent on the war, ``we should do whatever
possible to avoid wasting time''.
He clarified that Norway had kept out of the whole issue of the
ban on the LTTE in the U.K. and had not given any advice on it to
the British Government.
To a question on whether the ban would affect the functioning of
Mr. Anton Balasingham, who lives in London and is the chief
negotiator for the LTTE: ``I think it is in everybody's interest
that Anton Balasingham is able to function somewhere. Mr.
Balasingham is an important actor in what we all hope and pray
for, a peaceful settlement. It is well-known that he is the chief
negotiator of the LTTE, and it is essential that he can function
in that capacity.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : U.S. keen on expanding ties with India Next : Long-term U.S. assistance to Gujarat opposed | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|