|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, April 02, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Blair puts off elections by a month
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, APRIL 1. Weeks of uncertainty over the timing of the
British general election ended today as the Prime Minister, Mr.
Tony Blair, defying his Cabinet colleagues, decided to put it off
by a month to give himself more time to cope with the foot-and-
mouth crisis and, more importantly, to head of the charge that he
is insensitive to public opinion.
The election, which was widely expected on May 3, would now be
held on June 7 and a formal announcement is expected on Monday
when Mr. Blair returns from his weekend retreat at Chequers.
The Prime Minister's decision is believed to have annoyed his
Cabinet colleagues and party MPs, most of whom were opposed to a
delay. It caught the Culture Secretary, Mr. Chris Smith, on the
hop as he went on Radio Morning strongly opposing a postponement
unaware that a decision had already been taken. ``An embarrassed
(Mr) Smith later conferred with Mr. Blair's team and then
insisted he was opposed to any `substantial delay'', The Sunday
Times said.
Almost the entire Cabinet, including heavyweights such as the
Deputy Prime Minister, Mr. John Prescott, the Chancellor, Mr.
Gordon Brown, the Foreign Secretary, Mr. Robin Cook, and the Home
Secretary, Mr. Jack Straw, favoured an early election on the plea
that a delay would send out a wrong message overseas and that it
would be seized by the Tories to claim victory for their campaign
against a May election.
They also feared that since the foot-and-mouth was not likely to
be under control in a few weeks, the government could come under
pressure to delay the election further. There were already
demands today that it should be put off until autumn.
A senior Tory leader, Mr. Michael Portillo, accused Mr. Blair of
``dithering'' and said this was no time to think of elections.
As newspapers widely reported the rift in the Cabinet and the
Labour Party, senior figures were quick to close ranks. Mr. Robin
Cook denied that there was split, and the chairman of Labour
Parliamentary Party, Mr. Clive Soley, said though he still
favoured an early election, he found no fault with the decision.
Last week, Mr. Soley had taken an in-house party poll and
reported to Mr. Blair that over 70 per cent Labour MPs favoured
May 3.
A spokesman for the powerful Labour trade union maintained that a
delay was bad news for tourism as it would reinforce the
impression abroad that Britain was closed to business.
Mr. Blair's decision is believed to have been influenced by a new
opinion poll which showed that two-thirds of the people favoured
a delay, but even before the poll he had begun to have second
thoughts about a May poll. After his visit to some of the foot-
and-mouth afflicted areas, he sensed the public mood that early
election would expose his government to the charge of putting the
party above the country.
The Prime Minister's spokesman, Mr. Alistair Campbell, stressed
that the Prime Minister would do what was ``right for the country
as a whole.''
``The ministers were told that Mr. Blair wanted a month's delay
to preserve his image as `one-nation' Prime Minister sensitive to
rural concerns'', one newspaper said.
The non-Tory media, which had put its money on an early election,
was clearly disappointed with The Independent declaring that ``on
balance he has made the wrong choice.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Afghan minorities adapt to Talibanisation Next : U.S. to sell hi-tech weapons to Taiwan | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|