|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, April 02, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
From short-termism to strategy
THE EXPORT-IMPORT Policy for 2001-2002 announced by the Union
Minister for Commerce and Industry, Mr. Murasoli Maran, on
Saturday, is much more than an exercise in continuity in trade
policy liberalisation, which is an integral process of the
Economic Reforms Agenda. As a logical sequel to the proactive
Exim policy which Mr. Maran unveiled last year, the new policy
package rightly emphasises the export imperative which the
country needs to address in order to leverage its untapped
resources for effective participation in global markets.
Gratifying as the export performance during 2000-2001 has been,
with a 20 per cent estimated rate of growth, India has but a
minuscule share in global trade at less than 0.7 per cent. The
Government's target of an 18 per cent export growth for 2001-2002
is not too ambitious in terms of the achievement during 2000-
2001, but the looming uncertainties about the global growth rate
and particularly the creeping slowdown in the U.S. economy can
render the target rather elusive.
Although the dismantling of Quantitative Restrictions (QRs) on
the last remaining 715 tariff lines, as mandated by the WTO
Appellate Authority, is bound to be politically questioned and
even seen by sections of Indian industry as signalling a
traumatic period ahead, the apprehensions of a deluge of imports
seem quite unwarranted. The removal of QRs in recent years has
certainly not led to any conspicuous surge in non-petroleum
imports. The removal of QRs is after all followed up with
tariffication of the imports in question and with the peak
customs duty at 35 per cent with the option of countervailing
duties in cases of dumping, the Government can certainly ensure
that the interests of the domestic producers, both of
agricultural commodities and of manufactured products, are
adequately safeguarded. Mr. Maran has responded alertly to the
fears of flooding of the domestic markets by items of imports now
freed from QRs, by setting up an Early Warning System at the
Commerce Ministry for the requisite vigilance. Even apart from
this, the question of any massive assault on the domestic markets
by imports of merchandise (including second hand passenger cars)
is not so much a matter of legal access as it is one of
comparative landed costs, life-styles, logistics of moving
imports into different markets and the comparative availability
of locally manufactured products.
In the changing scenario of foreign trade where global openness
(and two-way traffic of imports and exports) is the key element,
there is a strong case for the Exim policy to move away from
short-term balance-of-trade considerations to a medium-term
perspective, for accelerating export growth as a platform for
industrial development, employment generation and for foreign
exchange earnings. This is precisely what the new policy
initiatives seem to capture. As Mr. Maran has projected it, a one
per cent share in total world export for India by the year 2004
would call for an export performance of the order of $75
billions, up from the current level of $43 billions. The
achievement of this order (which is patently too modest in
relation to what China has demonstrated over the years) will
obviously call for a sustained, multi-pronged export strategy. A
vital component of the strategy would be for Indian agriculture
and industry to gear themselves for an active, if not aggressive,
presence in global markets. Marketing initiatives which have
hitherto remained fragmentary need to be brought upfront. That
the new policy package is alive to this task is indeed a positive
testimony. That Mr. Maran also looks at the involvement of the
State Governments in the national export effort as a critical
component, is another clear indication that the policy is shaped
by strategic thinking. Beckoning to the Chinese-model Special
Economic Zones as the winning strategy has its own merits but
should not greater macro-economic attention be devoted to
bringing down the transaction costs all-round before an export-
led strategy can pay off?
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : Evolution of man | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|