|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, April 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
India not serious about talks: Pak.
By B. Muralidhar Reddy
ISLAMABAD, APRIL 6 Pakistan today slammed India for `its effort
aimed at imposing a military solution' on Kashmir and said that
if India was sincere about resolution of the conflict, it should
respond positively to the December 2 formulation of the military
establishment.
Formally reacting to the offer of a political dialogue with all
sections of peace-loving people of Jammu and Kashmir, contained
in the latest policy statement on Kashmir, a spokesman of the
Pakistan Foreign Office accused India of being not serious about
finding a peaceful settlement to the imbroglio. Leave alone
acknowledgement of the change in the nuance of the Indian
statement on the offer of a bilateral dialogue, there was not
even a mention of it in the three-para statement read out by the
spokesman.
Perhaps the response of Pakistan Foreign Office could not have
been different. In one of his latest interviews, the Pakistan
Chief Executive and the military ruler, Gen. Pervez Musharraf,
dubbed the Kashmir ceasefire a `farce'. In another interview he
had dismissed the concerns of India arising out of activities
from across the border as `baseless'.
The sum and substance of today's statement was that despite the
professed declaration of ceasefire in Kashmir, the Indian forces
``continue their `terror campaign' and the latest statement is a
reflection of its persistent effort to impose a military solution
in Kashmir, avoid meaningful talks and mislead the world
opinion.''
``The requirements of a meaningful dialogue were outlined in
Pakistan's statement of December 2. India must stop its
repression in Kashmir, respond to Pakistan's restraint, resume
meaningful dialogue with Pakistan with the participation of the
Kashmiri representatives and for this purpose allow the All-Party
Hurriyat Conference to visit Pakistan for consultation,'' the
statement said.
The spokesman said if India genuinely sought peace it should
`abandon its policy of violence and state terrorism'. ``It must
respond sincerely to Pakistan's proposal of December 2 for a
settlement of the Kashmiri dispute consistent with the aspiration
of the Kashmir people and in accordance with the Security Council
resolutions'', he said.
When asked whether Pakistan intended to complain to the United
Nations Secretary-General, Mr. Kofi Annan, on the `refusal' of
India to resume the stalled dialogue, the spokesman said Mr.
Annan, during his recent visit to the sub-continent had
counselled both the countries to sit down at the negotiating
table. ``His advice is a reflection of the world opinion. Refusal
of India to heed the counsel shows its obduracy''.
Militant organisation in Pakistan virtually echoed the same
sentiments. Within hours after the statement in New Delhi on
Thursday, the Hizb-ul Mujahideen denounced it as a `gimmick'.
Today it was the turn of the Lashkar-e-Taiba and other militant
outfits to debunk it.
The Jammu and Kashmir People's League (JKPL) dismissed the latest
Indian statement as `senseless'. Its chairman, Muhammad Farooq
Rehmani, said given the nature of Kashmir dispute, there was no
scope for a bilateral dialogue. In a separate statement, the
former Finance Minister and track-II activist, Dr. Mubashir
Hasan, said the latest Indian offer would disappoint many in
Pakistan and Kashmir. ``It is too much general. However, an
offer, seemingly inadequate, is better than no offer''.
No peace without us: Hurriyat
SRINAGAR, APRIL 6. The All-Party Hurriyat Conference today termed
the Vajpayee Government's Kashmir offer an exercise in futility.
The Hurriyat chairman, Mr. Abdul Gani Bhat, said ``the manner in
which New Delhi is dealing with the vexed Kashmir issue is
without any purpose''.
``Unless the Centre fulfils its earlier commitment of allowing a
Hurriyat delegation to visit Pakistan and Pakistan- occupied
Kashmir (PoK) to hold talks with their counterparts and militant
leaders there, no purpose can be served by entering into any kind
of dialogue with the Government,'' he said. He, however, made it
clear that Hurriyat was not against the spirit of dialogue and
that an everlasting solution to Kashmir issue could be found
through this medium alone.
On the Centre not putting any condition for the talks, Mr. Bhat
said there was nothing new about it as Mr. Vajpayee had said the
same thing a few months ago. ``We don't want to go by
conditionalities. We would like to be guided by realities.'' Mr.
Bhat said, ``Only determination and wisdom can help us achieve
the desired result and not the nomination of a chief negotiator
(Planning Commission Deputy Chairman, Mr. K.C. Pant) to hold
talks with us.''
He, however, added, ``I don't reject Mr. Pant's nomination. But
if you repeat exercises undertaken by Mrs. Indira Gandhi and
Sheikh Abdullah (1975 Accord), where will we go then? All
relevant parties to the dispute - India, Pakistan and the
Hurriyat - would have to engage themselves in a meaningful
dialogue to address the core issue of Kashmir.''
Echoing similar sentiments, former Hurriyat chairman, Mirwaiz
Umar Farooq, said New Delhi needed to give more clarification on
its offer of talks. ``All that the Indian Government wants is the
dialogue for the sake of peace. The offer makes no mention of any
concrete initiative or even honest motive for a permanent
solution,'' the Mirwaiz said.
- PTI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Jaswant Singh in U.S. for high-level talks Next : Norwegian envoy leaves to meet LTTE leaders | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|