|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, April 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
India, Bangladesh agree to restore status quo
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, APRIL 19. In a bid to prevent the boundary clash from
damaging irreparably their friendly ties, India and Bangladesh
quickly restored the status quo on their border.
Responding to questions on the firing incident which led to the
death of over 10 Border Security Force (BSF) jawans as well the
takeover of Pyrdiwah village by the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR), the
spokesman of the External Affairs Ministry said, ``It has been
agreed that the status quo ante on the border would be
restored.'' He added that ``action on the ground was under way to
meet this objective''.
According to the Home Secretary, Mr. Kamal Pande, who also
briefed the press, the BDR had vacated Pyrdiwah. Firing in
Boriabari area of Assam had also ceased since afternoon.
The decision to halt firing was taken at a flag meeting between
local BSF and BDR commanders in the Boriabari area. The BDR
Director-General, Maj. Gen. Fazlur Rahman, who spoke twice over
telephone with his BSF counterpart, Mr. Gurbachan Jagat,
expressed regret over the incident.
According to Mr. Pande, Maj. Gen. Rahman informed that
arrangements were being made to return the injured personnel, who
were now in the custody of Bangladesh, as also the bodies of 11
of those killed.
On whether the firing was carried out without Dhaka's consent,
the spokesman declined to comment on what he described as the
``internal affair of a friendly country.'' He also parried
questions on whether the Bangladesh side had offered an apology
for its ``unprovoked'' and ``unilateral'' actions.
The agreement, thrashed out after talks involving the Indian High
Commissioner and the Bangladeshi authorities, the Bangladesh High
Commissioner, the Ministry of External Affairs and the BSF and
BDR heads, covered two other aspects. Both sides agreed that
their border personnel should exercise ``utmost restraint'' to
prevent the recurrence of such incidents. Also, it was emphasised
that instead of using force, the existing ``institutions and
mechanisms'' should be exercised ``in a spirit of mutual co-
operation''. This was necessary for resolving all ``residual
issues'' related to the border.
Sources pointed out that a regular dialogue between officials of
the two countries from the Home and External Affairs Ministries
and paramilitary forces was well institutionalised.
In fact, the BSF and BDR heads, at their meeting which concluded
on April 1, had agreed to exercise maximum restraint along the
border. They also agreed to draw an interim boundary in the
disputed Muhuri Char sector. The Foreign Secretaries had earlier
decided to establish a Joint Working Group at the Home Ministry-
level to demarcate a controversial six km-stretch of the border.
`BDR action unacceptable'
Earlier during the day, the External Affairs Minister, Mr.
Jaswant Singh, termed the BDR action as ``unacceptable.''
Responding to concerns by members in the Rajya Sabha, he said the
situation along the Assam-Meghalaya-Bangladesh border was
``worrying'', though the Government was ``seized of it''. The
Leader of the Opposition, Dr. Manmohan Singh, described the
incident as a ``most unfortunate development''.
To clarifications sought by Mr. Dipankar Mukherjee (CPI-M) and
Mr. Swaraj Kaushal (Haryana Vikas Party), Mr. Jaswant Singh
denied that the incident was a manifestation of ``intelligence
failure''. Mr. Sanjay Nirupam (Shiv Sena) demanded a statement
from the Government and a discussion on the incident.
Haroon Habib writes from Dhaka:
The exchange of fire came to a halt at 3 p.m. today at Roumari
under Kurigram region of northern Bangladesh, bordering
Mankerchar town of Assam. BSF and BDR personnel had exchanged
heavy fire for the second consecutive day today.
The situation along the border near Roumari and Padua in Sylhet,
bordering Meghalaya, was now tension-free and peaceful as the two
sided had decided to resolve their dispute amicably and through
dialogue, the Bangladesh Foreign Secretary, Syed Muazzem Ali,
told presspersons this afternoon.
Flag meeting held
After the day-long parleys, the two sides decided to hold flag
meetings; the first took place at Padua today. The flag meeting
at Roumari could not be held due to the heavy rain, Mr. Ali said,
admitting that there were intermittent exchanges of fire late in
the day. There had been direct contacts between the chiefs of BDR
and BSF over phone, who instructed their respective field level
commanders to stop firing. While there was some exchange of fire
near Roumari in the morning for about an hour, things were quiet
at Padua, the disputed village which was claimed to have taken
over by BDR.
Mr. Ali said that as per their agreement, the BDR would hand over
the bodies of 11 BSF men when the Sector Commanders arrive at the
flag meeting tomorrow. Two injured BSF men would also be handed
over.
Sources here said that Indian officials had met the injured men
in hospital.
The Foreign Secretary, while expressing optimism of strengthening
the existing cordial and friendly relations, said, ``It has been
a great success'' for both countries to agree to sit within 24
hours for dialogue to resolve the issues. ``It is a clear signal
of cordial and cooperative relations that exist between the two
countries,'' he said, adding, ``it confirms that the
institutional mechanism that the two neighbours have are fully
functional''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : 'Accord' reached on passing budgets | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|