|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, May 01, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Chief of Defence Staff
THE PROPOSED appointment of a Chief of Defence Staff gives us a
unique opportunity to reorganise the Defence set-up of the
country with the aim of improving efficiency, functional
enhancement and greater integration in a tri-service approach to
projects and resource sharing.
The proposed merger of the service headquarters with the Ministry
of Defence and its associated financial advisors will enable the
government to reallocate responsibilities, eliminate duplication
and passing the buck from the service headquarters to the
Ministry of Defence.
Ideally, the new appointment of the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS)
would take over the planning of operations and the conduct of
various war-like operations with a unified staff in a more
coherent manner; at present, the Chiefs of Staff of Army, Navy
and Air Force function through a committee and present their
views to the Cabinet Committee. In the past, it has been noticed
that due to this loose set-up the projections and war strategies
were being nullified by pulls and pressures of the three chiefs
who would think of their own service interests and perceptions.
The proposed CDS who will be senior to all the service chiefs
would be able to present a unified, logical and unbiased approach
to the Cabinet Committee in the prosecution of war. In the
selection of the Chief of Defence Staff, the government will do
well not to get pressured by the service lobbies and the other
pressure groups thereby jeopardising the merit criteria. As a
consequence of this reorganisation the existing chiefs of the
three services would only be responsible for the individual
organisation, training and routine logistic matters.
With the proposed set-up, the CDS would execute direct
professional command and control for all operational requirements
through merged operational commands located at various places.
For example, the Western Command Headquarters (Chandigarh) and
the Northern Command Headquarters (Udhampur) of the Army will
have a total merger with the corresponding Air Commands that are
located in Delhi (Western) and Udhampur (Northern). As a result
of this change the existing Army operational commands, Navy's
fleet headquarters and Air Force commands would no longer be
controlled by their respective chiefs but a functional
operational commander located at Western, Northern, Central,
Eastern and Southern sectors. In the case of Southern Command
since there is a preponderance of Naval forces, the merger of
Southern Command, Pune, the Western Naval Command, Bombay and
Southern Air Command, Trivandrum may be headed by a Naval Flag
Officer.
Heartburning
There are major areas where there will be resistance from the
existing authorities. Appointment of the Chief of Defence Staff
from a particular service may cause intense heartburning among
the other service chiefs. There is already a talk that the Navy
and the Air Force feel threatened that the Army, being the
largest service, would benefit by the appointment of an Army
General as the CDS who would dominate the other two junior
services.
The proposed operational commands would involve the subordination
of the individual service formations and units to a combined
Chief of Defence Staff thereby requiring a major change in the
present mindset of service commanders. The bureaucrats in the
Defence Ministry would have to shed some of their overriding
powers and function in a new role forming a part of the unified
Ministry of Defence.
It has also been proposed that all production and procurement
units of the Ministry of Defence be clubbed under one Chief
Executive of Procurement who will be responsible for the material
supply chain of all weapons, ships, aircraft and hardware. The
Chief Executive will coordinate the research, design, development
and the production agencies of the Ministry of Defence including
the 48 large ordnance factories. Added to this would be the
merger of independent research and development establishments
with the ordnance factories or public sector units that are
geared for Defence Ministry's material items.
Ordnance factories
It has been proposed that all the ordnance factories and other
defence production units should be converted to autonomous public
sector companies with independent management techniques and the
culture of other important private sector conglomerates. In fact,
some of these public sector units could seek strategic alliances
in manufacture with industrial stellars like Telco, Ashok Leyland
and TVS.
This particular reorganisation would have to be given a time-
frame of about 2 years for gestation and final implementation.
The Defence procurement executive would make decisions on the
make or buy process based on his own evaluation of urgency,
technological criteria and capabilities of the indigenous
sources. This is one function which attracts public attention
because of the competition between giants of the military
industrial complex who are desperately seeking orders to fill
their coffers.
Though the proponents make claims of their superiority, the Chief
Executive will have to make a subjective selection after weighing
the matrix of various ratings for each system. The subjective
nature of evaluation which causes doubts on the selection process
can only be offset if the procurement executive and his team
display high standards of professional integrity and offer their
decisions for parliamentary sub-committee scrutiny.
The above reorganisation which will involve a major impact on the
present role of the ordnance factories, controlled by a board of
directors and the research establishments which are directly
controlled by the scientific advisor, would naturally evoke great
resistance from these independent empires that have long-
developed their own hierarchy.
It is hoped that Mr. Jaswant Singh, the current Defence Minister
and his advisor Mr. Arun Singh would have the will power,
political backing and PR skills to thwart the attempts of various
vested interests who would like the status quo to be always
perpetuated.
VICE-ADMIRAL (RETD.) I. C. RAO
AND BRIG. (RETD.) A. THYAGARAJAN
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Show for the fan club Next : Judges for political office | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|