|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, May 03, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
HC order against fast track courts stayed
By Our Legal Correspondent
NEW DELHI, MAY 2. The Supreme Court today, through its interim
direction, stayed an interim order of the Andhra Pradesh High
Court which suspended the constitution of the `fast track courts'
in the state and the appointment of judicial officers to these
courts.
The Bench comprising Mr. Justice B. N. Kirpal and Mrs. Justice
Rumapal made this order on a special leave petition (SLP) from
the Union of India.
Earlier, `mentioning' this matter, Mr. Soli J. Sorabjee, Attorney
General (AG) submitted that while the Government was constituting
the `fast track courts' to expedite the disposal of long pending
cases, the HC had made the interim order in question.
The HC in its order on April 27 observed that `prima facie', it
(HC) was of the considered opinion that the constitution of the
`fast track courts', pursuant to a scheme framed and announced by
the fiance commission and the appointment of judicial officer to
man these fast track courts suffered from serious legal and
constitutional infirmities.
``Any continuation or further functioning of these courts in our
considered opinion, may result in far-reaching and disastrous
consequences; it may create an irreversible situation,'' the HC
also said in its order.
The AG urged that the HC did not even elaborate as to how the
continuance of `fast track courts' would have an adverse impact
on the situation - which was already having heavy backlog of
cases waiting for disposal.
The SLP had, among other pleas, contended that the HC had
committed an `error of law' by virtually allowing a writ petition
by passing an `ex-parte order' on a mere prima facie view of the
legality of establishment of fast track courts without specifying
the ground.
A question raised in the SLP was whether the HC was right in
granting a blanket order of interim suspension (of operation of
`fast track courts' in the state) which could be against public
interest and a major setback to the process of expeditious
disposal of cases. The AG said that till date 488 `fast track
courts' had been established and the government had allotted
already Rs.78 crores for the purpose.
About 44 `fast track courts' were set-up in AP and that it was in
respect of the constitution of these `fast track courts' and the
appointment of judicial officers to these courts, the state HC
passed the interim order which was challenged in the SLP.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Case filed against entire village Next : CHATRI plea to HUDA on Master Plan-2020 | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|