|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, May 09, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Will French cinema beat Hollywood?
By Gautaman Bhaskaran
CANNES, MAY 8. As the 54th Cannes International Film Festival is
all set to begin unspooling a flood of cinema here at the French
Riviera tomorrow, France's home-grown movies appear to have won
new respectability after years of being hounded out of the
theatres by Hollywood.
At the Festival, four French works will compete for the
prestigious Golden Palm awards. Ms. Catherine Corsini's ``La
Repetition'', Mr. Francois Dupeyron's ``La Chambre des
Officiers'', Mr. Cedric Kahn's ``Roberto Succo'' and Mr. Jacques
Rivette's ``Va Savoir'' will hopefully give the big Hollywood
brigade at Cannes a run for cinematic pride of place.
It may not be very difficult considering the fact that French
films have lately changed tracks. Once known for their verbosity
and navel depiction, they have dropped these traits for what many
critics here feel a suspiciously American style of celluloid
grammar. The latest figures state that nearly 19 million people
saw French movies in the first two months of this year, and this
success is likely to be consolidated in the coming days as
popular local fare takes on U.S. imports. For more than a decade,
the French cinema was pushed about and browbeaten by Hollywood's
hype and hoopla, promoted by big money and enormous campaigns.
While American pictures took at least 55 per cent of the weekly
box-office receipts, France managed barely 25 per cent.
The worst year was 1999, when even Mr. Gerard Depardieu as Obelix
in the film ``Asterix'' could not stop Hollywood from collecting
about 65 per cent of the box-office, while French movies could
hardly garner 27 per cent. All this happened despite the French
Government's almost desperate move to save its own cinema by
regulating cultural imports. Cinema has been the main bone of
contention, with politicians considering it as an art form rather
than an industry. Obviously, it was regarded as a standard bearer
for the nation's culture, and was often propped up by liberal
subsidies. Such help may or may not have helped, but what seems
to have made a distinct difference is the French directors' move
to beat Hollywood at its own game. There has been a rise in the
number of pictures dealing with fantasies, adventures, crime and
comedy. They now show less of men and women being sad, talking
endlessly and having sex in the kitchen.
``La Tour Montparnasse'' is a ``chase movie'' set in the city's
ugliest skyscraper. A special effects work with Ms. Sophie
Marceau, set in the department of Egyptian antiquities at the
Louvre has not merely exploited the concept of demographics, but
has also captured the youth vote. One critic has been quoted as
having said that a reason for the resurgence of French cinema is
its bash at diversity. And there has certainly been a vast
improvement in quality, which took a beating, after the country's
``New Wave'' directors passed out of the scene.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Putin cult touches new high Next : India creating 'war hysteria': Pak. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|