|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, May 09, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
State Elections
| Previous
| Next
Kovalam keeps all guessing
By J. Ajith Kumar
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, MAY 8. The sea off the Kovalam coast is
rather calm, at least outwardly, most of the time. But there
could be undercurrents beneath the surface. The deceptive calm on
the surface has, many a time, proved to be disastrous too. The
same seems to be the case with the election scene in the coastal
constituency of Kovalam, where everything is apparently calm and
quiet, but simmering within.
A former Minister facing charges of sexual harassment of two
senior women bureaucrats, now faces a woman candidate in his home
turf. Will the battle for Kovalam in the beach constituency of
Thiruvananthapuram district, be a Waterloo for the former LDF
Minister, Dr. A. Neelalohithadasan Nadar? This is the topic that
is being debated in political circles.
Though the UDF claims that the allegations against Dr. Nadar
have not been made an election issue, there is no denying the
fact that it is `the' issue and other matters such as development
or the lack of it in the constituency come only next. A
whispering campaign, certainly, is on and is also gaining
momentum by the day.
However, Ms. Alphonsa John, Congress candidate, denies all this.
She says she has been harping on the backwardness of the
constituency, which her rival had represented four times. ``For
nearly a quarter of a century Dr. Neelan has been in the saddle,
in various capacities, as a Minister, MP and MLA. But what is his
contribution to the development of this totally backward area,
inhabited mainly by the fishermen community and other
economically weaker sections?" she asks.
The absence of a proper water supply scheme is one of the key
issues in this constituency lined by the sea on the one side, she
says adding that supply of fresh water still remains a dream for
the people here. There has been no infrastructure development
worth the name, no proper roads or bridges and no communication
facilities, as compared to the neighbouring constituencies. Even
the work on the Vizhinjam fishing harbour, started in the early
1960s, is yet to be completed, Ms. John points out.
The LDF camp seems to be confident of yet another victory for
its candidate. The nearly 22,000 margin of votes that Mr. Nadar
had secured in 1996, just cannot be wiped off that easily, the
LDF managers say. "The allegations levelled against him have not
yet been proved. Moreover, the people of Kovalam know him too
well to be carried away by such `false propaganda'. He is one
among us and is the son of this soil. We are with him through
thick and thin," they reiterate.
In his capacity as the elected representative of the people
here, he has done everything possible for the development of this
constituency, the pro-Nadar camp claims.
The UDF alleges that the `Neelan camp' has been playing the
communal card in this constituency where there is a predominant
Nadar presence. The Nadars form 30 to 35 per cent of the
electorate of over 1,80,000. The Latin Catholics come next in
strength. Incidentally, the UDF candidate belongs to this
denomination. The IUML and the PDP have considerable influence
among the nearly 25,000 Muslim voters.
The tall claims about the margin in the last elections do not
hold water right now, the UDF camp claims. In the two subsequent
elections to the Lok Sabha and in the local body polls, this
margin was almost offset. In the elections to the local bodies,
six of the eight `grama' panchayats favoured the UDF. The UDF
also wrested all the three district panchayat divisions falling
in the Kovalam constituency, the UDF managers recall. They also
accuse the LDF of trying to create the impression that the UDf
candidate is an `outsider' in the constituency.
The BJP has not yet been able to make its presence felt in the
constituency. More than his physical presence in the election
arena, Mr. V.N. Gopalakrishnan Nair, BJP candidate, appears on
posters displayed at vantage points in the constituency,
especially in areas such as Venganoor and Kalliyur. No doubt, his
electioneering is still on a low key and the UDF hopes to cash in
on the visible inertia in the BJP camp. In the 1996 elections,
the BJP had pocketed 3,649 votes, but over the years it has
certainly broadened its mass base in the constituency.
With the activists of the Sthree Vedi, an organisation committed
to the welfare of women and currently engaged in a campaign
against candidates facing sexual harassment charges, pitching
tent in the Kovalam constituency, the LDF camp is a bit jittery.
They have launched a tirade against Dr. Nadar, who has by now
been chargesheeted in the `Nalini Netto case'. Addressing small
gatherings of women and children in the coastal hamlets, the
Sthree Vedi workers, under the leadership of its president, Ms.
K. Ajitha, have been trying to explain the `disastrous
consequences' if Dr. Nadar is elected yet again. They have also
been flaying both the major fronts for not evincing `adequate
interest' in the issue.
In Kovalam, regarded as the capital of "God's own Country", the
sailing is not smooth for either of the major fronts. Will Dr.
Neelalohithadasan Nadar be able to ride the crest of a victory
wave yet again, or will the winds of change favour a triumph for
Ms. Alphonsa John, well, the answer is elusive at the moment.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : State Elections Previous : Social and political wind in favour of UDF Next : UDF hopeful of improving its position in Thrissur | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|