|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, May 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
State Elections
| Previous
| Next
Surprises galore in Kozhikode
By Our Staff Reporter
KOZHIKODE, MAY 14.The poll results of the just-concluded election
threw up major surprises in Kozhikode district. The uncertainties
which accompany a political poll outcome were clearly in
operation. This was evident from the very beginning as the first
polling figures started trickling in. Initially, it seemed as
though the UDF would usurp eight of the 12 Assembly
constituencies, but when the final results came the tally stood
at 6 each. The UDF had annexed four of the LDF seats. While it
maintained its sitting seats of Koduvally and Thiruvambadi, it
gained Kozhikode-I, Kozhikode-II, Koilandy and Kunnamangalam.
The LDF held on to its sitting seats in Vadakara, Nadapuram,
Beypore, Meppayur, Balussery and Perambra.
The anti-incumbency factor, alleged cross voting and the like
were obviously responsible for the reversal in fortunes.
The surprise wins termed as `attimari vijayam' in local parlance
were no doubt the IUML's victory in Kozhikode-II and the UDF
supported Independent, Mr. U.C.Raman's, victory in Kunnamangalam.
The Muslim League dislodged the CPI(M) candidate in the
Kozhikode-II constituency, long considered a Left bastion.
Despite the wafer-thin margin, this was the most surprising
victory where the IUML candidate, Mr. T.P.M. Saheer, polling
48,886 votes, usurped the seat from the LDF candidate, Mr.
Elamaram Kareem (48,099 votes). The latter's victory in this
constituency had been a foregone conclusion. The winning margin
here was a mere 787 votes.
The IUML registered a victory in Koduvally too where their
candidate, Mr. C. Mammootty, polled 65,209 votes, against his
Janata Dal-S rival, Mr. C. Mohisin (48,332). Here the IUML
registered a high margin when compared to the slender margins
otherwise evident in the district.
In 1996, the winning margin here had been a mere 94 votes, when
Mr. C. Moyinkutty had defeated his Janata Dal rival, Mr.
C.Mohisin. In fact, this slender margin had given rise to
speculations of a likely reversal in fortunes.
In Thiruvambadi too, the winning margin shows a commendable
increase.
Another constituency where a UDF-supported candidate swept the
polls was Kunnamangalam, where the UDF backed Independent, Mr.
U.C. Raman, defeated the CPI(M) nominee, Mr. P. Kunhan.
The victory of the Congress candidate, Mr. A. Sujanapal, in
Kozhikode-I was more or less a foregone conclusion. The
constituency has been alternately electing LDF and UDF
candidates. In Koilandy, where a neck-and-neck fight was on
between Mr. P. Viswan (CPI-M) and Mr. P. Sankaran (Congress), it
was difficult to predict the outcome. However, here too the
Congress made a definite dent into the vote banks of the LDF and
registered a victory.
Sources allege various factors which could be cited as reasons
for this definite change of fortunes. Cross voting by the BJP in
favour of the UDF is suspected to have been operational in
Kozhikode-I and Kozhikode-II. It is pointed out that the BJP
candidate, Mr. C. Prabhakaran in Kozhikode-I, polled only 6,787
votes when the BJP candidate, Ms. Sumathi Haridas, had polled
more than 9,556 votes in 1996.
In Kozhikode-II meanwhile, the BJP candidate Mr. K.P.G.
Pannikker, registered 7,345 votes, in contrast to the 10,782
votes polled by the BJP candidate, Mr. K. Krishnan Master, in
1996. Sources therefore point to cross voting. In Beypore too,
the BJP is alleged to have voted in favour of the IUML candidate.
The only constituency where there has been an increase in BJP
votes in this election is Kunnamangalam. In 1996, the BJP
accounted for 11,878 votes, as compared to 13,741 votes polled by
the BJP candidate, Mr. P.K. Velayudhan this time.
When compared to 1996, when the BJP registered 1,04,568 votes in
the district, the figure came down to 92,968 votes in this
election, a difference of 11,600 votes, sources reveal.
Meppayur recorded the highest polling percentage - 82.39 per
cent with Kozhikode-I accounting for the lowest - 68.33 per cent.
Besides the fact that the UDF has improved its tally in the
Assembly from two to six, there has been an increase in the votes
polled by the front.
Moreover, the UDF improved its position in ten constituencies in
the district barring Balussery and Beypore. The LDF meanwhile has
improved its performance in comparison to 1996, in certain
constituencies such as Perambra and Beypore.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : State Elections Previous : Was there a conspiracy to defeat VS? Next : A hero's welcome for Antony in Cherthala | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|