|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, May 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
China factor in South Asia
CHINA'S PRIME MINISTER, Mr. Zhu Rongji, has reaffirmed his
country's strategic proximity to Pakistan in the present context
of an expanding international debate on the new U.S.' plans for a
missile defence system. Mr. Zhu's task became easier during his
latest visit to Islamabad even as Pakistan's Chief Executive,
Gen. Pervez Musharraf, adopted a nuanced stance of opposing the
current U.S.' move on the ground of `principle' - any plan that
could reignite a missile competition or a nuclear arms race on
the international stage must be disfavoured. Mr. Zhu's visit to
Islamabad might have been planned well ahead of Washington's
policy pronouncement on missile defence; but the eagerness of
both China and Pakistan to seize the occasion to tune themselves
to the same wavelength is hardly surprising, given their enduring
strategic bonhomie of several decades. On the latest occasion, it
was truly a Hobson's Choice for Pakistan after the Vajpayee
administration had controversially committed official India to a
policy of welcoming Washington's new ideas about a global
strategic framework. It hardly mattered to the military-led
Pakistan Government that New Delhi did so without even appearing
to have evaluated the long-term implications of the American
gameplan. In these circumstances, the coincidental visit to India
by a ranking Chinese Communist Party mandarin, Mr. Li Chang Chun,
acquired diplomatic overtones unrelated to his status in
Beijing's official hierarchy. In any case, Mr. Li advocated that
``pragmatism'' should transcend the strategic and political
differences between the two countries. New Delhi harped on the
need for ``sensitivity'' by the two sides towards their
respective ``concerns''. Shorn of the euphemistic niceties, the
reality is that official New Delhi's latest honeymoon with
Washington has induced Beijing and Islamabad to reinforce their
equation.
It is indeed too early to foresee with absolute certainty whether
the present Bush administration in Washington will risk a full-
scope cold-war-style antagonism with China sooner or later.
Unlike during the earlier Cold War between the U.S. and the
former Soviet Union, the Chinese leadership is in no position now
to count on a bloc of its own, comprising a plurality of
`satellite-states', in a manner the old Kremlin did for a number
of decades. Viewed in this perspective about Beijing's overall
strategic disabilities, New Delhi can probably seek to downplay
its new discordant notes that reverse its own recent attempt at
singing a tune of `multipolar' politics on the global stage.
Another argument that seems to enthuse official India is that
China will, in a quintessential autonomous move, seek to meet the
threat it perceives from the U.S. For China, the argument goes,
the policy imperative is not determined by the Vajpayee
administration's recent action of welcoming Washington's mega-
plan for a missile defence network on account of America's
related goal of downsizing its enormous nuclear arsenal.
The empirical reality that should not be missed, however, is that
the Vajpayee administration has chosen to make light of India's
legitimate right to strategic independence. The contrast with
China cannot have been more vivid, whatever be the immense
differences between the respective political systems as also
styles of the two countries. The schedule of Mr. Zhu's latest
visit to a few states bordering India could have been sketched
out before the current international controversy erupted over the
anti-missile question. It is, therefore, possible that China has
not signalled any intention now to encircle or contain India in a
strategic sense. Yet, two questions will need to be sorted out in
India's national interest in this specific context. To be
addressed are the issues arising out of Washington's new calculus
of ``friends and allies'' as also post-Soviet Russia's eventual
response to it. Moreover, New Delhi should, in time for Mr. Zhu's
planned visit to India later in 2001, reconcile the pros and cons
of coexistence with China in the strategic sphere.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : New Government in Assam | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|