|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, May 26, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
MSEB petitions Enron panel to set aside PPA
By Mahesh Vijapurkar
MUMBAI, MAY 25. In a quick follow up to its notice rescinding the
power purchase agreement with the Enron-sponsored Dhabol Power
Company(DPC), the Maharashtra State Electricity Board today filed
a petition with the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission
(MERC), seeking damages and relief from DPC for
misrepresentations on its power generation capability. It wanted
the PPA to be set aside forthwith.
Hearings will start on May 29, the day the Godbole Committee on
renegotiation is to discuss with DPC the tariff reduction issue.
Given the anxieties of several individuals and entities, it is
possible that quite a large number of them may seek to intervene
against the DPC and in favour of the MSEB. MERC can hear the
petition since it is a dispute between two licensees and
utilities. Appeal would lie with the High Court and then the
Supreme Court.
The thrust of the contention before the MERC is going to be that
DPC misrepresented on the capability in the PPA but when
confronted with its inability to meet the generation levels
required under the contract, it actually ``acknowledged and
admitted'' that performance did not conform to the schedules in
the PPA. In short, the quality of equipment was suspect.
This admission came from the DPC on the first recorded incident
when the power supply did not conform to the norms prescribed.
Within 180 minutes of the cold start, the ramp up was not to the
level of 658.56 mw on January 28, 2001. Similar defaults occurred
on February 13, and March 29 as well. Sources said DPC even
sought a post facto declaration certifying that all was well.
The notice rescinding the PPA, issued on Thursday, and the 200-
odd page petition with about 800 pages of supportive documents to
MERC today are substantively similar. The DPC is accused of ``not
bonafide conduct'' and ``a campaign'' of confusion and
obfuscation by wrongful withholding of rebate payments,
pressuring MSEB to make payments not due, invoking guarantees,
arbitration and declaring political force majeure without
justification.
It was only on Thursday that DPC was served a two-page notice by
the MSEB voiding its contract, holding the latter guilty of
misrepresentation, following serious lags in supply of power.
MSEB has accused the independent power supplier that ``capability
of Dabhol Power Station was materially different from the
contractual parameters mentioned in the power purchase
agreement.''
In today's petition to the MERC, seeking to set aside the PPA,
the contention is more or less the same except that some historic
details including the flurry of arbitration notices by DPC have
been listed. Now it is for the MERC, which follows transparent
procedures, to make the details of the petition public, perhaps
after the weekend.
The notice rescinding the contract and the petition today points
out DPC's admission that the power plant does not conform to the
PPA stipulations and was not capable of meeting the contractual
terms in respect of the crucial operating characteristics and
dynamic parameters.
Mr. Vinay Bansal of the MSEB had written to the DPC's Mr. Wade
Cline on Thursday, ``you have acknowledged and admitted that the
actual performance and capability of the power station does not
conform to the start up and loading profile curves of schedule 6
of the PPA.'' Therefore, the PPA is ``void and/or is voidable at
our option.''
No to 'protest payment'
PTI reports:
Irked by the legal notice slapped by MSEB, the DPC today refused
to accept the board's ``protest payment'' of Rs. 139 crores
towards the April bill. ``We had sent the bill today, but they
refused to accept it nor have given any reasons for the same,'' a
senior MSEB official told presspersons at Mumbai.
He said the board would now directly deposit the amount in DPC's
account and also send a letter to this effect to the
multinational stating the circumstances under which the payment
was done.
* * *
DPC seeks Centre's help
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, MAY 25. The Managing Director of the Enron-promoted
Dabhol Power Company (DPC), Mr. Wide Cline, today met the Union
Power Secretary, Mr A. K. Basu, here and apprised him of the
latest situation on the dispute with the Maharashtra State
Electricity Board (MSEB).
Power Ministry sources, confirming the meeting, said the DPC was
advised to appear before the Maharashtra Government- appointed
re-negotiating committee headed by Dr. Madhav Godbole and present
its case.
The sources said the Centre's representative in the panel, Mr.
A.V. Gokak, had been fully briefed about the issues involved and
would try to find common ground between the disputing parties.
The Centre has also made its stand clear that the two parties
should come to an understanding before it could do anything in
the matter.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Frigate launched Next : Trinamool warming to Vajpayee Govt. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|